Monday, May 07, 2007

Zionuts vs. the UAE

Though far from an objective piece of journalism, the Gulf News reported:

Ignorance about the UAE and anti-Arab racism are behind efforts to stop an American university from opening a campus in Dubai, say UAE academics.

As a note, journalists can add "so-and-so says" after anything to distance themselves from points they want to make, according to media critics.

The University of Connecticut came under pressure from state legislators about its plans with the Dubai Education Council (DEC) to establish a satellite campus in Dubai. Pro-Israel politicians and interest groups cited the UAE's 'human rights record' and its policy against normalization with Israel.

Connecticut legislator Andrew Fleischmann said the UAE must change "the way it deals with Israel" and improve the situation of its rights-less foreign workers. Maybe the UAE should open a branch of the Minutemen, oh wait, the foreign workers there have legal status, unlike some, uh hum, places Fleischmann lives in, like the United freaking States (with 12 million undocumented people - contrasted with the 4.5 million people total in the UAE).

Fleischmann argued that "many" Israeli students (who make up .03 %) and faculty members (zero currently) at UConn would be unable to benefit from it if the UAE continued to deny them entry. UConn agreed that it was "extremely important" that Israeli students had access.

Of course, the legislators did not take into consideration one of the primary reasons gulf states are trying to build satellite campuses: post-9/11 restrictions and a generally anti-Arab climate are making it much more difficult for Arabs to come here as international students. According to Randa Kayyali,

What has dropped drastically post-9/11 is the number of nonimmigrants who are issued visas and admitted to the United States as tourists, students, or temporary workers. The largest numerical drop between 2000 and 2004 (70 percent) has been in the number of tourist and business visas issued to individuals from Gulf countries, which include Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and Oman.

It seems a balanced Connecticut legislature would address this discriminatory dynamic, if they care about equality so much.

I am not dead set against the legislature pressuring UConn, as long as decisions are based along the lines of human rights rather than policy towards Israel. Firstly, I think we need to pressure Arab countries to improve their human rights practices. The condition of foreign workers is awful.

Secondly, this would be a great precedent for divestment from Israel. If UConn said it will not do business with countries that keep large portions of second class citizens devoid of rights, Israel would fare much worse than the UAE under such scrutiny. While there is exploitation of foreign workers in the UAE, they are far better off than the Palestinians living under the apartheid-like siege of Israeli occupation. Then again, it appears the legislators are much more bent out of shape over the UAE's policy towards Israel than they are about its human rights record.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Its intresting how you excuse coutries like the UAE the foriegn workers arent only exploited they are treated non human by the locals.

Anonymous said...

GOD BLESS UAE.WE WILL HAVE ONE OF THE BEST EDUCATION IN THE COMING YEARS AND REDUCE THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS COMING TO THE US WHERE THE DISCRIMINATION IS SPREAD!.ABOUT THE TREATMENT OF WORKERS,WE HAVE IMPORVED THIER CONDITION BY INVESTING HUGE AMOUNT OF MONEY IN HOUSES EQUIPED WITH ALL BASIC REQUIRMENTS THAT MOST WORKERS DONT ENJOY IN THIER HOME LAND.COMING TO UAE FOR THEM IS BLESSING.US MEDIA GIVES THE WRONG CONCEPT.I AM FROM UAE.THANKS

Anonymous said...

Will said it best, when it comes to the treatment of palestinians in Israel they are suddenly quiet.

The main reason why they are against the opening of a campus in UAE is that they think they can keep those "ayrabs" from having a good education. So in their little mind "ayrabs" should be uneducated.

Anonymous said...

Note how the guy from UAE states that the workers conditions are better in UAE than in their own country, implying that they're still treated worse than UAE citizens. How can he in the same breath claim that the Palestinians are mistreated? Hey, just like you said, "so what, they're still treated better than in their home countries!"

That is the Arab mind at work.

Anonymous said...

Why is it the West's job to educate Arabs? Can't their own people do the job or do you need us Westerners to do everything for you, such as run your infrastructre, pull the oil out of the ground, and build you airplanes to fly into buildings?

Anonymous said...

To the anon above,
It is common among thhe universities around the world to open campuses in other nations. It is not that the arabs asked for it. There are good universities in the middle east, we are not desperate. You seem to have an hate against the arabs amd muslims, even for a small agreement between two universities. It just shows your ignorance how hateful you are. Bigot!

Anonymous said...

Nope. I have a hatred for looters and practicioners of the victimhood mentality. Kaboomers to the T.

On further thought, I always hear from Kaboomers that "they don't hate Jews, just Zionists!" Well, considering the majority of Jews in the world identify themselves as Zionists, I can fairly live by your standards and say:

"I don't hate Muslims, just non-apostate Muslims" :) Of course, I'm not as dumb or vile as a kabomber, so I won't say that.

Anonymous said...

My standards, Where did I say I hated Jews or zionists??
You either have a reading disability or you really are an idiot. When was the last time you checked at an asylum?

Anonymous said...

Will and his ilk have stated repeatedly their disdain for Zionists. They call them Zionuts. If they want to call the majority of World Jewry Zionuts, that's fine by me, but don't be coy. Say what you mean. They hate the majority of the World's Jews and like a couple of sell-outs.

It's like how the Democrats love Hagel or the Republicans love Zell Miller, and both claim they have no ill feelings against the other party because they can use one member as proof that they don't hate. OK, take Chompsky and Finklestein, they were disowned years ago and represent about 1% of Jewish opinion. Take that weasel Adam Shapiro as well, who needs them anyway? Besides what's he accomplished recently anyway. LOL.

Anonymous said...

So according to you everything will and and co. say is also said by me????

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised that you feel you're important enough in the first place that I would have been responding to you. LOL!

Then again, I didn't see you refute my point either.

Anonymous said...

Your response is so stupid, it does not need to be refuted at all.