The international campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions against
On May 30, 2007, the UK University and College Union (UCU) Congress, which represents 120,000 instructors, passed a motion that calls for debate on an academic boycott against
The vote was taken at its first Annual Congress in
The conference delegates overwhelmingly voted to accept the recommendations of a report following the fallout of the 2005 decision by another British union to impose an academic boycott of
After a long study, the resolution’s language reflects the caution and care they took to craft a unified position on this issue, given both the potential controversy as well as the sharp urgency to end Israel’s now four decade-long occupation of the Palestinians in the West bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.
That interim report accepted by the union recognizes “this is a difficult area. We are aware of great wrongs being committed throughout the world against colleagues in other countries. But there is always a balance to be drawn between boycotting and damaging those colleagues in the hope that the state will address the harm that it is inflicting on academia, and the harm that the boycott itself inflicts on academia.”
There were two motions. The first was not as strongly worded and did not call for a boycott though it was generally sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians. The final vote was not a close one. Sixty percent, or 155, of the delegates who voted supported it. Ninety-nine opposed it. Seventeen did not vote. However, the majority was bigger for the second motion calling for “A moratorium on research and cultural collaborations with
The UCU’S general secretary, Sally Hunt, doubted that the outcome of the vote reflected the views of the delegate’s constituents, the members of the organization. She said “I do not believe a boycott is supported by the majority of UCU members, nor do I believe that members see it is a priority for the union.”
As noted by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
(PACBI), “academic boycott has been advocated in the past as an effective tool in resisting injustice.” Though many academics in particular find the tactic undermines academic freedom, it has been used effectively in many liberation movements.
PACBI raises two important examples where academic boycotts were ultimately effective. Mahatma Gandhi and those calling for Indian independence boycotted British-run academic institutions to enhance Indian self-reliance and to resist those institutions maintaining British colonial domination over
Later, the African National Congress (ANC) advocated a comprehensive boycott of the entire South African academy to further isolate the roguish, apartheid regime. PACBI argues that “Moral consistency makes it imperative to hold
With the 40th anniversary of
ALSO:
The largest British labor union, the 1.6 million-member UNISON, has threatened to launch a drive to boycott Israel, according to press reports yesterday, which were based on sources within the Israeli workers' union, Histadrut.

19 comments:
Will, I think we may have finally found a home for you that you can appreciate, full of other hypocritical assholes. Congrats! And enjoy the Hagus.
this divestment and boycott stuff is still going on? Has any thing positive resulted from this?
(not being sarcastic, im genuinely curious)
This boycott is extremely one and short sighted. It places all of the blame on one side. What about the historic peace negotiations that Arafat walked away from at camp david. When the Palestinian side refused peace and instead started a second intifada where were all of these boycotting academics?
the boycott divestment sanctions movement was launched less than 3 years ago, and has gained incredible momentum. while the palestinians continue to suffer (today, the IDF killed two children--they were planting a bomb, of course), i truly believe that better days are coming, and that the apartheid regime in Israel will be dismantled)
Why would Brits boycott Israel when it is Palestinians who are holding a BBC correspondent hostage?
I can't imagine.
Do you think they'd be more favorable to Israel if Israel started kidnapping people?
Imagine an "academic boycott" of Arabs/Muslims after 9/11.
And then tell me this isn't racism, at it's worst.
Actually, I think the US should begin a unilateral academic boycott on Arabs and Muslims. It must not be racist, since the politically correct Europeans support the concept.
Only until suhc time as Arab and Muslims respect international laws, such as the universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the Hague and Geneva Conventions, and the Vienna Conventions.
Until then, no more US investment in Arab and Muslim research projects. No more students from Arab and Muslim countries to be enrolled in US universities, and immediate revocation of all Arab and Muslim student visas. Needless to say, no more scholarships (Sorry, Haneen) and no more work visas for high tech fields. All current work visas for Muslims and Arabs to be terminated.
Should get the message across. Eh?
I'm sure all those Arabs and Muslims can find a place for themselves in Europe.
I think complying with international law is just a bit more important than complying with politically motivated UN resolutions, myself.
I know a certain Palestinian Doctor who went through med school on US scholarships that I'd like to see off at the airport, personally. (Sorry, Twosret)
Fair is fair. Lets get the party started.
What? Nobody wants to comment about British racism? I would have thought racism was a big seller on this blog? WTF kind of leftists are you honorary Palestinians, anyway?
"Imagine an "academic boycott" of Arabs/Muslims after 9/11."
What a waste of time. We don't boycott them because there is nothing they have to boycott. What? Figs and dates? We can grow those artificially in California with less resources using our brains. Something missing in the Arab world. But seriously, us boycotting the Arab World would just give them another victimization excuse to complain why their countries import a lot more than they export.
Let's just face the fact that the Arab World is like a retarded cousin you have to take with you to the school dance and tell your peers "I know he, he's just a little different, you know?"
I mean seriously, when you read a post here, you have to wonder how Palestinians can have a state of their own before primates. I think the difference is, monkeys have a hard time operating detonators with the lack of opposable thumbs.
What a waste of time. We don't boycott them because there is nothing they have to boycott.
Stop bathing with soap. Actually, stop bathing altogether. Anything that developed from irrigation technology is out of the question.
Throw your carpets out. Your globes, your contact lenses and glasses, most of your clothes.
Pick up a religion, if you haven't already. Secularism has it's roots in Arab philosophy and was initially rejected by post-Dark Ages European scholars like St. Aquinas.
Textiles, marble, ceramics, sugar-refining, glazed kitchenware, silk, papermaking
Mathematics, geometry, astronomy, physics, chemistry, architecture, optics, meteorology, engineering, pharmacology, medicine, biology, botany, anatomy, zoology, and philosophy
I've barely scratched the surface.
Just make life easier; go live out in the woods, though I'm sure that's "selling out" in some way or another.
1001 inventions
Muslim Contributions to Humanity
Anonymous 12:06,
You don't seem to know what a boycott is. Why don't you figure it out before you post again?
Give the "Muslim contributions to humanity" a rest. Islam over-ran 3 of the greatest cultures of the ancient world, and stole THEIR contributions to humanity. Didn't anybody notice that the "contributions" of Muslims pretty much vanished within a few generations after Islam was forcefully stopped from further military expansion?
Well, maybe Muslims didn't... but everyone else did. And that's why we "ignore" Muslim contributions.
By the way, until Islam over ran Asia Minor(Greece), Persia and Egypt - that part of the world was the heart of human civilization. Europeans have Islam to thank for their current position of dominance, and for the fact that virtually all major advances for the last 500 years have been made by Europeans. There wasn't anybody left in the traditional centers of learning to do it. So, Europeans studied the ancients, and forged ahead.
Thanks, Islam! We couldn't have done it without you :P
Islam over-ran 3 of the greatest cultures of the ancient world, and stole THEIR contributions to humanity.
That's quite a convenient explanation.
Apparently, when Muslims build upon previous ideas, it's referred to as "stealing."
I suppose it then follows that Europe "stole" Arab medical technologies (among ).
That's of course foolish. Europeans only "borrow" and discover and innovate, they don't "steal", appropriate, rehash.
Islam over-ran 3 of the greatest cultures of the ancient world, and stole THEIR contributions to humanity.
That's quite a convenient explanation.
Apparently, when Muslims build upon previous ideas, it's referred to as "stealing."
I suppose it then follows that Europe "stole" Arab medical technologies (among .)
That's of course foolish. Europeans only "borrow" and discover and innovate, they don't steal, appropriate, rehash.
Love the formatting, guys.
Apparently, when Muslims build upon previous ideas, it's referred to as "stealing."
Muslims didn't "build upon" previous ideas. That is the problem. They over-ran previous cultures and road high on the accomplishments of those previous cultures. And then they stalled out.
Craig, this is by far one of the most idiotic lines of argument you've tried defending.
Ibn Rushd, Al-Asma'i, Ibn Bajjah, Alpetragius, Al-Battani, Ibn al-Haitham, Ibn Hubal. ALL ARABS. All great scientists, all innovators, many or most polymaths.
But if you want to sit on your thumbs and conjure up some non-existent Arab foil to high noon, no amount of historical documentation is going to change your mind.
Post a Comment