Racism against Arabs and Muslims is alive and well in the U.S. More often than not, such racism goes unnoticed primarily because antagonism towards Arabs and Muslims has become so commonplace and acceptable in American discourse. Too often we see pundits with certified histories of unquestionable and open racism against Arabs and Muslims (such as Coulter, Pipes, etc) invited time and again to cable news shows. Such racism, it seems, is only addressed when manifested in a way that is prohibited by law. Rarely do we see a level of moral outrage by members of society comparable to that when other minority groups are victimized (take, for example, Imus, who has a long track record of anti-Arab racism that precedes his last racist outburst).
That said, yesterday, Patrick Syring of Arlington, Virginia was indicted after sending racist messages to the Arab American Institute (AAI) last year during Israel’s bombardment of Lebanese civilians. The AAI is an Arab-American non-profit organization headed by James Zogby and known for its moderate views. In the numerous telephone and email messages, Syring is reported to have said:
“The only good Lebanese is a dead Lebanese. The only good Arab is a dead Arab.”
“Arabs should burn in the fires of hell for eternity and beyond" and praised Israeli forces for "bombing Lebanon back to the Stone Age where it belongs.”
"You and your Arab American Institute . . . should burn in the fires of hell for eternity."
Some observations... First, I’m not so sure that Syring has committed a crime. Though I have not seen the indictment, the published quotes do not seem to rise to the level of threatening. Second, Syring is very proud of his racism; apparently, he identified himself in the phone message he left to the AAI, and sent all of the emails from his personal account. Third, for the record, this is not a rare and unique occurence. This happens all the time with Arab- and Muslim-American groups, activists, and professionals. Receiving hate mail has just become a part of being Arab in America. Fourth, though I believe he has a First Amendment right to be racist, why did it take the State Department over a year to get rid of him? (Technically, he was not fired, but retired last month). That’s right, believe it or not, Syring worked in diplomacy. More surprising, Syring held a high position at the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon, of all places. I wonder if Syring would have also lasted a year at the State Department had his racism been directed towards another group.
Thursday, August 16, 2007
The Only Good Lebanese is a Dead Lebanese, Says Former U.S. Diplomat to Lebanon
By
Fadi
KABOBegories: american politics, arab-americans, Fadi, lebanon, Scandals
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

15 comments:
Receiving hate mail has just become a part of being Arab in America.
Kind of like receiving death threats from Muslim extremists is part of being American.
Or Indian.
What a stupid comment. Are you telling me that the number of Arabs and Muslims who receive hate mail from Americans is equal to the number of Americans who receive the same from Arabs and Muslims? Are you insane?
And no, 9-11 doesn't count as one giant hate mail from the Muslim community, because only a handful of idiots perpetrated that act!
Roy, you cant compare the personalized and directed attacks at Arab- and Muslim-Americans by racists to al-Qaeda blanket threats and attacks.
Racism against Arabs and Muslims is alive and well in the U.S. More often than not, such racism goes unnoticed primarily because antagonism towards Arabs and Muslims has become so commonplace and acceptable in American discourse
What about those claims your blogging companions were making that Palestinians were gaining so much "influence" in the US, Fadi?
(one of the)Anonymous,
Are you telling me that the number of Arabs and Muslims who receive hate mail from Americans is equal to the number of Americans who receive the same from Arabs and Muslims?
Hate-mail? I've been physically threatened 4 times in the last two days on this blog. Who needs to get into "hate mail" - read this blog.
I'd be worried about this guy "Khaled" if he wasn't such an obvious punk, the way he makes threats and then immediately pussies out when somebody offers to take him up on them. He displays some fine Arab courage, doesn't he?
Fadi, it's not because of "racists" that Arab Americans have a bad reputation in the United States. It's because of the behavior of Arab Americans.
And no, 9-11 doesn't count as one giant hate mail from the Muslim community
I didn't suggest that it did. Are you suggesting that the entire non-Muslim "community" sends hate mail to Muslims? Why did you introduce the completely spurious notion of "mail from a community"?
because only a handful of idiots perpetrated that act!
It's not at all clear that there are fewer Muslim terrorists than there are people sending hate-mail to Muslims.
Roy, you cant compare the personalized and directed attacks at Arab- and Muslim-Americans by racists to al-Qaeda blanket threats and attacks.
Why not? Just how personal is "The only good Lebanese is a dead Lebanese"?
Moreover, Jews are four times more likely to be attacked because of their religion than Muslims. Do you weep for them? Do you ignore a larger problem in favor of a smaller one?
Yes, you do.
Roy, I think what people are trying to tell you is that the racism is being personally delivered to specific people or organizations here (in this case, James Zogby and the AAI). Yes, I agree with anon, there is definately a difference (in terms of different levels of victimization) between personally receiving an email or phone call and an al-Qaeda video. Have you ever been the victim of a hate crime or racism Roy (and no, 9/11 and Osama videos do not count).
Have you ever been the victim of a hate crime or racism Roy
I have been! Right here on your blog! "Ahmed" threatened me with violence because I'm white. That's a hate crime, right? You're a lawyer, you tell me. Is it, or no? Would you take my case, Fadi, if I filed one against him? If not, I suggest you back up a bit and re-examine your statements on this issue.
Oh, sorry, that was "Khaled". So many fake people on this blog using so many fake IDs I sometimes get confused. You know, because I'm just an ignorant hillbilly cracker and such stuff like that.
Do you even read what some of the Arab commenters on this blog say?
Craig, I'm sorry, that is not my field of law. Pick up the yellow pages, it is likely a good starting point for you in your search for a lawyer.
I'm not sure how your experience should make me "back up a bit and re-examine [my] statements on this issue." I don't think you thought that one through at all. My statement on this issue is very clear; racism is wrong, hate crimes are wrong, and racism against Arabs and Muslims is, generally, an accepted form of legitimate discourse in this country.
I'm asking if you only care about hate crimes against Arabs, Fadi. The guy made demeaning racial slurs against me and then followed it up with a threat to do me bodily harm, right here on this blog. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that is just the kind of hate crime this post is about, right?
If that *was* your field, would you take a case if the perpetrator was an Arab, and the victim a non-Arab?
And no, I'm not interested in actually filing a case against him. I've lived in ethnically diverse areas all my life, and racism is just the way it is. I just like to point out when an extreme racist is complaining about racism, himself. I'm weird that way.
is that the racism is being personally delivered to specific people or organizations
Then it's only racism in form; it's personal attacks. Racism is directed against an entire race, it is not personal. That's why we call it racism. Because it's about race. Not about a particular individual's race. See how that works?
Hey, no charge. I'm just returning the favor for how you all explain Arabic terms.
racism against Arabs and Muslims is, generally, an accepted form of legitimate discourse in this country.
I call shenanigans. It happens; it is not accepted as legitimate discourse.
It's certainly less "accepted" than anti-Jew actions, yet you paint it as some sort of top-tier, normative thing.
is definately a difference (in terms of different levels of victimization) between personally receiving an email or phone call and an al-Qaeda video.
One difference is that al Qaeda has demonstrated that they really want to kill. Most such emails are idle threats by people blowing off steam.
Reporters and bloggers get them routinely. Michelle Malkin, for one.
Denial-of-service attacks,
racist, sexist, foul-mouthed stuff.
It happens to even non-Arabs.
Here are some perpetrators of violence against non-Arabs. Should make you feel a little less singled out.
Roy, are you crazy? Of course being the targetted recipient of a hate crime or hate mail is distinguishable from 9/11 and such al-Qaeda videos. Yes, in some regards, me, you, and every other American are the subject of these videos. But trust me, as somebody who receives hate mail and who has been the victim of hate crime, it's a different victimization with a much more resonating sting to it than that which you and I feel from Osama's videos.
As to your claim that anti-Semitism is much more acceptable than Islamophobia or anti-Arab racism, I think you must live in a bubble.
Roy, are you crazy?
No. Is that a requirement for posting here?
Of course being the targetted recipient of a hate crime or hate mail is distinguishable from 9/11 and such al-Qaeda videos.
So we agree. Hooray. You did notice that I said they differed. Didn't you?
But trust me
As I said, I'm not crazy.
I think you must live in a bubble.
Yes, it's a bubble called reality. I gave the numbers already. Have you got numbers that tell a different story, or am I just supposed to "trust you"?
Just curious, programmer craig, did you know Syring? He was posted in Beirut some time after the bombings there? You were there around that time I believe. Do you have any knowledge about his actions/activities? I've put together that maybe that time and his connection with the attacks there led to such strong and unrepentant vitriol. Nothing justifies them, of course, and I'm sure they did go to the level of being threatening -- hence the subpoena. But his presence at State for so long is curious. How long did his hatred grow? From where did it stem? How was it fertilized? The war must have brought to light his feelings of revenge. Any insight prog. craig? ~ The Informer
Post a Comment