Thursday, August 23, 2007

Stop the Madrassa Coalition: "Arrest all Muslims"

The Khalil Gibran International Academy is one of several dual-language public schools in New York City. The school plans to supplement the general New York public school curriculum with Arabic language and Arab culture lessons. As a result, some residents of New York City, harboring a racist hatred of anything and everything Arab, created the Stop the Madrassa Coalition to pressure the New York City Department of Education to shut down the school before its inaugural semester this Fall. Though it appears that the school will open as planned, the Coalition has succeeded in forcing the resignation of Debbie Almontaser, the school's Principal, after Almontaser claimed that the word "intifada" means "shaking up." In fact, the word "intifada" does mean "shaking up." The campaign to expel Almontaser, like the mission of the Coalition, was entirely racially-motivated.

KABOBfest has discovered that a number of the Coalition's Board members have a long history of actual racism (as opposed to the fantasy allegations drummed up against the school's Board members) against Arabs, Muslims, and/or Blacks. For example, the Board includes notorious free-thought hater Daniel Pipes. Among Pipes's many racist declarations, perhaps the most instructive on the Coalition's motives is his belief that "increased stature, and affluence, and enfranchisement of American Muslims...will present true dangers to American Jews." Mind you, this is a man who has expressed support for the U.S.'s internment of Japanese during World War II.

Most illuminating, though, is the Coalition's Treasurer, David Yerushalmi. As an Israeli settler in the occupied Palestinian West Bank, Yerushalmi proudly and openly flouts the Fourth Geneva Convention. Among his accolades, Yerushalmi is the founder of the Society of Americans for National Existence (SANE). SANE recently published a policy proposal that shows just how poor of a lawyer (and racist) Yerushalmi is:

"[A]dherence to Islam as a Muslim is prima facie evidence of an act in support of the overthrow of the U.S. Government through the abrogation, destruction, or violation of the US Constitution and the imposition of Shari'a on the American People. . .It shall be a felony punishable by 20 years in prison to knowingly act in furtherance of, or to support the, adherence to Islam."
Yerushalmi's website also states:

"There is a reason the founding fathers did not give women or black slaves the right to vote."
-AND-

"Is there something unique about the Black American (or, at least the Black New Yorker) that leads him to murder so disproportionately and to most often kill and victimize his own? Do we see patterns of Black culture that arise out of Africa and the wanton murder of blacks by blacks there? Why have the colonized blacks of the African continent, after having acquired their freedom and independence, so willingly slaughtered their own and live in despicable disease and squalor despite a land of enormous riches while Indians of the Indian sub-continent have successfully moved from British rule to democracy and relative civility even in a country that still maintains social inequalities as a fact of their culture?"
(tarboush tip: CAIR)

Though none of these sexist and racist declarations bothered his fellow Board members and friends, Yerushalmi's recently discovered anti-Semitic remarks have finally raised some eyebrows.

Notwithstanding, Board member Pamela Hall defends Yerushalmi's hatred of Jews with the same silly, stupid, and offensive logic of the Coalition that has me wondering, has racism against Muslims and Arabs in this country reached such a level that people are deferring to this (at least enough deference to generate a controversy over a harmless public school): “If he’s speaking of the radical liberal Jews who were at the [pro-school] rally Monday, then these people deserve to be criticized. These people are anti-America. These people are extreme, outrageous leftists. They work so hard to destroy this country ... and, sadly, many of them are Jews.”

12 comments:

programmer craig said...

The Khalil Gibran International Academy is one of several dual-language public schools in New York City.

No problem. With have many schools here around LA that offer classes in multiple languages. I myself went to a high school in my junior year that offered classes in Mandarin, Cantonese and Spanish.

The school plans to supplement the general New York public school curriculum with Arabic language and Arab culture lessons.

Problem. Unacceptable. No public school should be subjecting students to indoctrination into a foreign culture. Full stop.

That may be OK for a privately run and funded school, but not public schools.

Fadi said...

well, that is your opinion (and I can give you credit for opposing all of the NYC schools that have such a curriculum, and not just the Arabic one). legally speaking, the New York City Department of Education is not prohibited from focusing on a foreign culture.

programmer craig said...

Is Civil Rights your area of expertise, Fadi? I thought you said it wasn't, before?

Are you really sure the courts are going to find in favor of the school, when a student's parents inevitably file suit that their child's civil rights are being violated?

programmer craig said...

Or will this school only accept students who are Arab? Or who sign waivers promising not to sue the school for providing inappropriate education? Neither of those those things sounds like a civil rights violation? In a public school?

Nada said...

I think the culture lessons are just as important as the language lessons. I took French for five years in a public high school and a large part of the curriculum was learning about France and French-speaking countries. What good is the language if you can't learn the meaning behind its people?

Fadi said...

Craig, lame comments. There are no legal grounds to sue the school, it doesn't take a legal scholar to reach that conclusion.

Of course, if any public school in the U.S. engages in the hypothetical situations that you've presented, that's a different story. But there's no indication right now that any public school in the U.S. will engage in such actions.

programmer craig said...

Fadi, If my child was enrolled in that school and was being taught "Arab Culture" whatever that is supposed to be, I would file a lawsuit.

How does this school intend to protect itself from parents like me?

There is my hypothetical.

PS-What is "Arab Culture"? Can you even define that? What does such education include? And why isn't the world history & culture that all public school students in the US good enough?

Fadi said...

Craig, it would not have to protect itself from you, because you would have no legal grounds to sue the school for teaching Arab culture. The frivolous case would be dismissed immediately, the school would never even have to hire a lawyer.

Pali-American said...

"Can you even define that?"

Hysterical.

I'll define Arab Culture for you - What Zionuts copy.

PC, you should teach a class on zionut teabagging. You'd be good at it.

richards1052 said...

Fadi: I've got to make it a habit of following the links you provide when you comment at my blog. This post contains precisely the quote I was looking for (but couldn't find) when I wrote an earlier post about Yerushalmi. Thanks for noting the incredibly hateful anti-Islam passages fr. his site which you note here.

And thanks for pointing out via yr link to the Muslim Link that he is one of the few Jewish white supremacists in the world. I simply couldn't believe it till I read the passage I quote at this post which I just wrote.

programmer craig said...

Craig, it would not have to protect itself from you, because you would have no legal grounds to sue the school for teaching Arab culture. The frivolous case would be dismissed immediately, the school would never even have to hire a lawyer.

Fadi, I guess you were telling the truth when you said civil rights wasn't your area of expertise :P

The school can't teach one foreign culture without giving equal emphasis on all other foreign cultures. Not if it is a public school.

Fadi said...

"The school can't teach one foreign culture without giving equal emphasis on all other foreign cultures. Not if it is a public school."

Craig, how about you stick to programming. What you're thinking of is religion and the anti-Establishment clause. A public school is not prohibited from focusing on one culture.