
I've just returned from seeing Israeli director Eytan Fox's new film The Bubble. You may have heard of his previous films Walk on Water, and Yossi and Jagger, which has been ridiculed in a previous posting on this site (I thought that snow cavorting scene, notwithstanding the problematic Lebanese backdrop, was very sweet!). A hugely popular director in Israel with a lot of crossover success, Fox's films have been getting increasingly political on the Palestinian issue. From an absent enemy status in Yossi and Jagger, to the introduction of a major Arab character in Walk on Water (Yousef Sweid, who plays the role of Ashraf in The Bubble), to finally tackling the conflict head on in this film.
The plot recounts the story of an Israeli reservist disgusted with the occupation, who notices Ashraf the Palestinian love interest being degraded at a checkpoint. Their lives intersect again in Tel Aviv, where Ashraf escapes to for work. He becomes part of the Israeli leftists social circle, before political events and murder in the West Bank drive events toward a fiery climax. Eytan Fox is openly gay and makes many connections between the oppressed status of homosexuals and Palestinians. He is a critic of the violent culture of masculinity which he believes, much like the Lebanese scholar Evelyn Accad, to be responsible for war in general.
The film, which tackles the subject of Israeli-Palestinian relationships, indulges in many of the clichés one would expect: cultural relativity, Arab wedding fading into Israeli beach ecstacy rave, tears followed by sex, and finally, whowuddathunkit?!, a suicide bombing. But beyond this, the film makes many important and sometimes touching statements: about the impermeability of cultures that paradoxically causes enemies to love each other more, about the naiveté of peace movements and how they get crushed, about wounded masculinity and what it must do to avenge itself. This last theme is one that was tread in Paradise Now (which I though was infinitely inferior to Divine Intervention, the only Palestinian art-house film worthy of the name!), what with the main character having to atone for his deceased father's collaboration and dishonor via the most forceful of methods. Homosexuals in Israel and Palestine are not assumed to be of the same kind, and much time is spent telling, without judgment, how each negotiates their own space.
Of course the film won't pass a radicalism test, but I think it's notable already for the stir it's caused in Israel and the connections it makes between machismo and war, in a way that doesn't subsume gender to nation or vice versa, but shows how one is integral to the other. The film is called The Bubble in reference to the bubbles that many bystanders to conflict find themselves in, capable only of seeing and caring about what's inside their sphere.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
The Bubble, a Film by Eytan Fox
By
Mehammed "Abou" Mack
KABOBegories: films, Mehammed "Abou" Mack
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

14 comments:
thanks for reviewing this film. i wasn't able to see it but a friend did recently and said it was good until the end which seemed highly improbable. i'll have to disagree about "divine intervention" however. i thought it was pretentious and trying way too hard to be art housy. yesterday i saw "hot house" about palestinians in israeli prisons, which i recommend. it was filmed over the course of the last elections. gives insight into how political prisoners continue the struggle from behind bars & reminded me of northern irish prisoners' diaries from long kesh prison in the 70s & 80s. check it out if you have the chance.
When do we get to see the film about the Israeli prisoners of Hamas and Hizbullah? Perhaps the red cross should see them first. Could you please make this request of them Ellen?
hey ellen, i actually LOVE divine intervention! Maybe I'm just a snob! I prefer symbolism to reality.
Thanks for the post and comment Ellen.
I never got into the 'Divine Intervention' vs. 'Paradise Now' debate. I felt they were such different films. DI was deep, yet non-narrative and full of visual gags and cultural/political references. It struck me as an artistic film about existence in this particular milieu.
PN was a richer narrative dealing with the classic themes of great fiction -- honor, morality, friendship, and sacrifice. Though also in a Palestinian context, it dealt more squarely with life under occupation (I think DI was more set in Nazareth, if I remember right; DI was set in Nablus).
Both had values and are of course landmarks in Palestinian cinema.
Will
anonymous,
Israeli soldiers were abducted because they are the aggressors. it's quite simple, don't steal someone's land and you won't get abducted;)
Noor,
Sure, go ahead and abduct them. We are at war after all and if you think that furthers your goals, hey, who am I to stop you. I am sure the abduction of Shalit was a great help to Gazans and Hamas and it really helped get international sympathy to what is happening there. NOT.
My question is different, why won't you let the Red Cross visit them? Are you aware that you are committing war crimes? Or are the Geneva conventions just for Israel? Why should I demand my government to abide by them if you don't insist Hamas abide by them also?
let the red cross visit them. i'm fine with that. the point is, israel started the war, israel is the agressor. stop stealing palestinian land and accept one country with equal rights for all and there won't be any prisoner problem on either side.
Please write to your Hamas representative asking to let the Red Cross see Shalit.
Stop murdering Jews like in Hebron in 29 or lynching them like in Ramallah and we might deem you human enough to live with. Palestinians kill their sisters and daughters for "honor" reasons. You think I want to live in one country with such animals? Do you want me to live in one country with the animals that were dancing on rooftops when Saddam fired rockets at civillian populations? Do you want me to live in one country with people that support suicide bombings by women of other women and children? Do you want me to live in one country with people educated by FarFour?
I would rather die fighting than be murdered by a Palestinian like those Jews in Hebron, Ma'alot and many other place. So please, take your barbaric people and go live elsewhere.
you already live with jewish versions of the people you describe. they are called zionists, jackass. don't act like your shit don't stink.
Pehaps we do. So why do you want to live in one country with us? Each person can live with his own stench. It is the Palestinian stench that the Jews can't stand and the Jewish stench that Palestinians can't stand.
I know I don't want to live in one country with you for the reasons above. You don't like me, so why do you insist on sharing a country?
because i don't believe in separate but equal. only racists do. why reward racists with their own institutionalized racism in the form of a state? the best reaction is to dismantle it with one state with equal rights for all. besides, even if i can't change your mind, there is hope for your children. the less segregation they grow up with, the less racist they'll be.
So you don't believe in states? Should the US be separate from Mexico or should they be one big state?
i don't believe in racist states. are you confusing me with quiqui? we are not the same person.
And how is the US less racist than Israel, or don't you believe in the US also?
Post a Comment