Wednesday, October 03, 2007

No One is Beyond the Zionut Wrath

Apparently no one is too high for the Israeli lobby and its foot soldiers to target. Nobel Peace Prize winner and anti-Apartheid hero Desmond Tutu was recently invited, and then dis-invited, to speak at a small Minnesota university.

Last April, the Justice and Peace Studies program at St. Thomas University, lined up the former Archbishop Desmond Tutu for a campus appearance. A speaker of this importance does not appear at St. Thomas too often. Tutu was the chairman of South Africa's truth and reconciliation commission -- one of the most significant bodies of its kind.

Well before the program could roll out the red carpet for its esteemed guest, St. Thomas administrators moved to cancel the talk, which was slated for next Spring. The campus officials were "concerned that Tutu's appearance might offend local Jews."

What you are about to read is NOT made up.

"We had heard some things he said that some people judged to be anti-Semitic and against Israeli policy," says Doug Hennes, St. Thomas's vice president for university and government relations. "We're not saying he's anti-Semitic. But he's compared the state of Israel to Hitler and our feeling was that making moral equivalencies (sic) like that are hurtful to some members of the Jewish community."
Tutu said that Israel was like Hitler?!?!? That is the funniest thing I've read in some time.

The chair of the Justice and Peace program was demoted for telling Tutu why his event was canceled.

The local alternative paper, the City Pages, looked at the transcript of his most critical speech, and found nothing to substantiate the allegations against him.
During that speech, titled "Occupation Is Oppression," Tutu lambasted the Israeli government for its treatment of Palestinians in occupied territories. While a transcription clearly suggests his criticism was aimed at the Israeli government ("We don't criticize the Jewish people," he said during the speech. "We criticize, we will criticize when they need to be criticized, the government of Israel"), pro-Israeli organizations such as the Zionist Organization of America went on the offensive and protested campus appearances by Tutu, accusing him of anti-Semitism.
Look, St. Thomas might just be caught between some bad blood from the old days. Tutu is a long-standing critic of Israel's treatment of the Palestinians, which he famously said reminded him of his treatment (and here) in apartheid South Africa. And Israel, which is so dear to the "local Jews" who the administration listened to, was a big ally of apartheid South Africa.

St. Thomas' administration is almost laughable for this decision. That they would bend over backwards to please a few vocal members of a diverse community and dis-invite such a historical figure is so incredibly petty and small-minded. It is hard not to feel bad for them. As Tutu is probably telling himself, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."

Jewish Voice for Peace is calling for reasonable people to let St. Thomas know the error of its ways
Click here to write to Father Dease and urge that he reverse this tragic course. Tell him you want to see Prof. Toffolo reinstated as chair of the Justice and Peace Studies program and that the words and views of Bishop Tutu are important ones for the students at St. Thomas University to hear.
[tarboush tip: muzzlewatch]

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Will, do you have any idea how ironic (let alone comedic) it is for you to link/credit a website called "muzzlewatch"?

You could be their poster child for stifling free speech/expression.

Let the comedy/hypocrisy continue.

Fadi said...

yes Will, you are so well known for stifling free speech/expression???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Anonymous said...

He actually is.

Wrote a column calling for disinviting a speaker to Berkeley - ironically - home of the "Free Speech Movement."

Hard to get more hypocritical than that, to begin with, but then complaining about other people adopting his own tactics? That's certainly one way.

Amazing that educated individuals such as yourselves can't see the irony.

Whatever.

Anonymous said...

I mean, seriously, if you wonder why your movement has very little traction in the places you think it should have the most, and why nothing of substance that you're calling for ever gets accomplished, it's because of these reasons.

Lack of ability to see the huge hypocisy of certain actions. It's not because of some imagined conspiracy.

It's certainly fun to watch, though.

Anonymous said...

One last thing on this note:

As for this line:

It's not because of some imagined conspiracy.

I don't mean to suggest that there aren't people out there trying to counter you - of course there are.

Having said that, you make their jobs so ridiculously easy. It's tragic, really.

Fadi said...

And what does any of this have to do with the merits of Will's post? Nothing... Ok then.

Will said...

Anonymous,

Your points are idiotic.

I guess Tutu was an enemy of free speech because he called for international divestment from and sanctions against the apartheid regime.

Calling for divestment and boycotts is an act of free speech. Protesting a controversial speaker is free speech -- when a university silences a speaker, that is a violation of free speech. When powerful organizations pressure universities to silence speakers, that is against the spirit of free speech.

Has the cloudiness in the peanut floating in your head given way to clarity yet?

Anonymous said...

Fadi,

And what does any of this have to do with the merits of Will's post? Nothing... Ok then.

Wrong. And even if you were right, which you're not, so what?

Pointing out that it's laughable (and ironic and hypocritical) for Will, of all people, to criticize other's attempts to stifle free speech has everything to do with the merits of the post.

Having said that, I think Tutu should speak wherever he is invited - and I think the University made a mistake here. A mistake, I'll note, that Berkeley did not make when Will tried to stifle free speech.

Good for Berkeley and bad for this podunc Univeristy.

Will,

I guess Tutu was an enemy of free speech because he called for international divestment from and sanctions against the apartheid regime.

Nice projection, but a feeble attempt to change the subject.

Of course he wasn't. You were an "enemy of free speech" when you tried to get a speaker kicked off a campus that birthed the Free Speech Movement.

People can agree or disagree with Tutu - but I never made the claim you tried to project on to me.

Just because I point out your blatant hypocrisy doesn't mean I'm against (or for) Tutu speaking wherever he wants. As I just wrote to Fadi, I happen to think he should be able to speak at that University, or wherever else he wants.

when a university silences a speaker, that is a violation of free speech.

That's exactly what you were calling for!

Haha. Too funny.

Has the cloudiness in the peanut floating in your head given way to clarity yet?

The projection and hypocrisy is almost too much to take.

Can't wait to see what you come up with next.

I love this:

WILL: calling for someone to be kicked off campus = "Free Speech"

Will: if the University did what I called for: "Censorship."

Hahahah.

Wow, I don't think anyone on this site has delved deeper into self-parody. And that's impressive.

Fadi said...

So your point has nothing to do with the merits of Will's post. All you're attempting to establish is:
1. Your obsession with Will (I'm sure Will is flattered)
2. Will is a hypocrite (which, as you know, has nothing to do with the merits of the post and everything to do with the author of the post)

Be honest here... how many pictures of Will do you have hanging in your room?

Liat said...

1. How can Tutu say that Israel is apartheid if he has never been there himself?
2. I don't think stifling someone's freedom of speech is ever going to solve the problem, even if they don't know what the hell they are talking about.
3. I think anonymous should stop anonymously posting.

Anonymous said...

As someone who, I assure you, is not obsessed with Will, maybe I can clarify this misunderstanding.

The argument was that Will is decrying the University for disinviting Tutu as an affront to free speech, yet at the same time, Will has similarly urged Universities to disinvite speakers with whom he disagreed with. Hence the apparent hypocracy.