// you're reading...

Uncategorized

The Pakistan Bhutto Party

Benazir Bhutto was a great verbal champion of democracy. I remember reading an article about a speaking tour she gave in the United States when she was PM. The article noted she used the word “democracy” roughly 60 times per speech. That however did not make Pakistan any more democratic but it did shift public opinion about it in America, as polling during her tour showed.

As an aside, Pakistan still is leagues ahead of the oppositionless Arab regimes, in which elections are nothing more than a spectacle with a foregone conclusion.

Still, I was a bit irked to see that the replacements of Benazir Bhutto in the Pakistan Peoples Party included her husband, who named their 19-year old son, a student at Oxford University, as the party head. They announced her husband, a former minister who was widely believed to be corrupt (which included jail time. He claims it was politically-motivated), would remain in custodianship until he finishes his studies. It is more than a bit strange that a dynasty will run a centrist people’s party aimed at promoting democracy.

As Anatol Lieven argues in last weekend’s Financial Times, Pakistan needs more than a dynasty to function and prosper. He argues only a broad coalition could resist a military takeover or religionist usurpation. Pakistan should try to move away from such politics, which do not empower the people but rather the established elite.

Then again, it’s not as if America is much ahead, with a Bush or Clinton in executive office for the past 30 years — and the prospect of four more. It is without surprise that the American government stood behind the Bhutto dynasty by re-inserting her into Pakistani politics. As noted by former National Security Adviser Zbignew Brzezinski:

I think the United States should not get involved in Pakistani politics. I deplore the absence of democracy in Pakistan, but I think admonitions from outside, injecting exile politicians into Pakistan, telling the Pakistan president what he should or should not wear, that he should take off his uniform, I don’t really think this is America’s business and I don’t think it helps to consolidate stability in Pakistan.

Did you like this? Share it:
Filed Under  , ,

Discussion

No Responses to “The Pakistan Bhutto Party”

  1. Her son is fine as hell! That’s not an endorsement of his politics, however. That whole family is corrupt.

    Posted by Anonymous | December 31, 2007, 5:58 pm

Post a comment

Connect With Us Ya Hmeer!

resume resume

Recent Posts

So, Who’s the Threat to America Again?
August 20, 2012
By Guest
Where Do We Keep Islamophobia?
August 15, 2012
By Shubnum
Lobbying Versus Advocacy
August 1, 2012
By Mehrunisa
On the destruction of Speaker’s Corner
July 17, 2012
By Abubakr
Stateless & Speechless, A Palestinian Regains Speech
July 12, 2012
By Hanitizer
White, Black American groups ‘swap’ summer interns
July 10, 2012
By Guest
The Costs of Stripping
June 25, 2012
By Mehrunisa
Be The Fundamental Pizza of a Man
June 25, 2012
By Guest
In US, They Want Fun, Fun Fun
June 23, 2012
By Sana
I Ain’t Afraid of No Regime
June 15, 2012
By Husam
ADC: Arab American Professionals’ Gateway to DC
June 12, 2012
By Hanitizer
Influence And Freedom
May 23, 2012
By Guest
Will Sacha Baron Cohen Bring His Muslim Bashing To An End?
May 22, 2012
By Hanitizer
On Chafed Oddballs, Siberian Socialites and Missed Opportunities
May 5, 2012
By Guest
A Single Roll of the Dice
April 23, 2012
By Guest