What I really don’t get about the siege imposed on Gaza is the goal of said siege. To destroy Hamas? Hamas’ popularity is higher than ever-the siege and the incursions and killings just juxtapose the image of Hamas fighting the Israeli army with the frequent image of Abbasshole attending dinner parties with Olmert and Barak in Jerusalem.
To convince the Palestinians to give up the armed struggle? I don’t know how Zionuts think the world operates but when I’m chilling in my living room and an Israeli missile lands in my brother’s lap, I’m more inclined to want to grab an AK and inflict pain on the perpetrator. And then when my sister, injured in the attack, can’t get to the hospital because you’ve banned us from receiving the fuel that the ambulances need to operate, I’m left to live the cruelty of this irony. Say we manage to get her to hospital through the dark (because you banned electricity) and sewage-strewn (because, again, there is no fuel to power the sewage treating plants) streets on the back of a donkey cart, I know she’d die anyway because you’ve somehow convinced the world that medicine is contraband; those dastardly Gazans would just use it to fight their occupiers.
Whatever the goals, these are the results:
• 130+ (and counting) patients dead because Egypt and Israel wouldn’t give them the mercy of medical treatment.
• 55% of Gazan children are bedwetters. These kids see death everyday in their face from the moment they’re born. Forget about this lost generation-the ones that survive are going to have to raise the next one.
• Most of Gaza’s ambulances are inoperable, standing idle as the stream of necessary fuel dries up and the stream of bloody wounded and dead turns into a flood.
• Sewage has flooded entire neighborhoods, as the lack of fuel and electricity required to pump and treat sewage propagates an already deadly health situation.
• Tens of thousands of university students cannot reach their classes with 95% of vehicles in Gaza out of fuel. Ditto for employees.
• 110,000 schoolchildren now rely on emergency UNRWA meals.
And on and fucking on.
See what I don’t get is how the world is so easily fooled. Israel lies and says that it must starve and bomb and kill 1.5 million humans because that’s the only way to weaken Hamas and their flying pipes. And then the Shabak writes up a report claiming that, a year after the total siege was imposed, Hamas is now stronger than ever and has fighters and an arsenal comparable to that of Hezbollah. Eh? So why is Gaza still getting murdered?
One thing is becoming clear though: this cannot last. The people of Gaza are at rock bottom. Throughout the week, Palestinian factions in Gaza, led by Hamas, Jihad and the Popular Resistance Committees, have been warning that a people explosion is imminent. Many took this to mean that there will be another human outpour across the Gaza-Egypt border. Immediately, Egypt issued threats and proclamations, sent reinforcements to the border, and closed off the main bridge across the Suez supplying the Ariesh and Rafah regions near the Gaza border. That is, should the Palestinians get through the massacre awaiting them at the border, they’d find no food or supplies to restock on in Egypt.
Today, the government in Gaza announced that this explosion is coming within the next two days, and that it will solely be aimed at Israel. I don’t know how they’re going to go about breaching the Israeli border-Israel has never been squeamish about mowing down nonviolent protests. If the Palestinian resistance goes the violent route, the result will be the same: huge casualties.
But whatever happens will be understandable, if unpredictable. After all, the world’s never placed an occupied people under sanctions and a suffocating siege before.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Gaza on the brink
By
Mohammad
KABOBegories: Gaza, human rights, Mohammad, siege
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

9 comments:
you start out by saying "what i don't get.."
what we should get is that
1) israel's stated goals are never truthful.
2) israel is deparate. if it makes peace, the forthcoming future does not look good demographically for its ethno-racist "jewish state" identity. if it makes war, the forthcoming future does not look good demographically for its ethno-racist "jewish state" identity.
3) israel is addicted to blood.
4) long live palestine.
I don’t know how Zionuts think the world operates but when I’m chilling in my living room and an Israeli missile lands in my brother’s lap, I’m more inclined to want to grab an AK and inflict pain on the perpetrator.
But having "crude" missles lobbed at elementary schools (let alone suicide bombers on buses, in cafes, etc..) should make Israelis want to have a big group hug with the Palestinians.
Quite the hypocrite, Mohammed.
i love the thought of calling Israel a racist state for identifying as Jewish, but then the closer "long live Palestine."
That is just awesome. Keep it up.
Oh, Fatima, you might want to send a letter to the Arab League, and tell them how "racist" it is to have 22 countries that identify themselves as Arab.
And then there's the OIC - got a lot of countries that identify themselves as Muslim.
That's a lot of racist countries out there.
You have your work cut out for you, but since I know you are against racism, you will take to the task with relish.
"Long live Palestine" indeed.
Just awesome how blinkered some people are.
But I know you don't want to be a hypocrite, so you have a busy life ahead of you fighting all that Arab/Muslim ethnocentrism and racism.
Good lcuk.
Anon 7:04, that is exactly your problem. your understanding begins only with palestinian attacks. That whole occupation, displacement, apartheid and ethnic cleansing thing doesn't happen in your twisted mind.
Mohammed,
Whatever.
Continue to believe that one side is allowed to be violent, and then complain when violence is visited upon that side.
That has gotten you, exactly, yeah - nothing.
Well, that's not true. It has "liberated" Gaza.
How's that going?
Nice work. And your response proves a lot.
I said nothing about my feelings towards Israeli policies.
My understanding doesn't "begin" (shows how corrupt your thinking is) with Palestinian attacks. It just includes them. Because, you know, they are happening. And they don't help Palestinians one bit. They help Israelis. A lot.
Fine, but again your logic is fundamentally flawed. I'm not advocating violence. I'm saying violence is a natural reaction to violence, displacement, occupation, apartheid. The question I posed was what exactly is Israel trying to achieve by inflicting all this on the Palestinians? Because all it gets them in return is violence.
"flawed" is a subjective term.
Obviously, what you just wrote - despite your stating you don't advocate violence - is aplogizing for violence.
There wasn't much - if any - violence against Egypt and Jordan when they had the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years after 1948. In fact, the Palestinian violence against Jordan didn't happen until 3 years after they ceded the West Bank to Israel. Palestinian violence in Lebanon didn't really start until the 80s, and they had been up there, under "apartheid" rule, for 30+ years. And they weren't fighting to end "apartheid" status up there, and there's no movement to end it now.
So your "logic" is flawed. I don't really begrudge your desire to place blame elsewhere - that is also "natural" - but it doesn't reflect the history.
Having said that, this is what Israel is trying to achieve (by the way, it's the same thing Hamas is trying to achieve): keep up at least a low level conflict so they have an excuse for their excesses and hope that the public will not challenge them on it.
If Hamas "gives up" - that's fine by Israel too, even though that's not what they want. They can claim "victory." If Hamas keeps "fighting," they can claim "necessity."
It's win-win for right-wing Israeli policy makers.
Hamas, on the other hand, has no chance of winning, or even "winning." But they'll gladly take the support of the local populace for the "resistance" over being relegated to just a "movement," or worse, a "political party."
Yes I was apologizing for violence. I don't know what your deal is but even the most idealistic of pacifists can't deny that violence is a natural reaction of those who have been subjected to it. And thats all way beside the point-which is that 1.5 million people under occupation are being starved and squeezed and murdered and the world is fine with that.
Equating Egyptian and Jordanian control of Gaza and the West Bank with Israeli occupation is another display of your flawed perspective on history. As is your ignorant equating of Israel and Hamas.
www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=25362
What I really don’t get about the siege imposed on Gaza is the goal of said siege.
I'll make you a deal: you tell me what the goal of the launching of rockets is, and I'll explain the goal of the siege.
Post a Comment