Disclaimer: This is really Mohammad’s post-but, like a typical Arab male, his laziness (in regards to learning how to use the editing functions on blogger) and his intimidation in the face of a strong Arab female (in regards to how fragile his ego felt when biting a concept, a theme created by an Arab female), prevented him from posting the topic under his name.
The recent prisoner exchange between Hezbollah and Israel was a historic event, returning all Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails to their homeland, as well as the bodies of close to 200 fighters killed in Israel over the last three decades. Even more importantly, it fulfilled Hezbollah’s stated goal when it captured two Israeli soldiers in 2006.
The deal inspired praise and criticism across the political and social spectrum, not just amongst the countries involved, but across the world. That diversity present even amongst us here, so rather than post personal reactions, we held another one of our Spitfireside Chats on the topic:
Sunbula: i feel divided at times about supporting Hizballah or not. yes they are like the only people who in the recent past have given the Israelis a run for their money, but i often feel doubtful about their adopting of the Palestinian cause. when nahr el-barid was being destroyed last year, they cheered for the Lebanese army. i respect their tactical brilliance but in the larger picture they are a conservative religious party that wants to fight israel for its own interests and has a reactionary socio political vision, so i think when supporting their small victories we as leftist/progressive people should keep this in mind.Quiqui: Hear, hear.
Kalash: I’m a little confused by the prisoner swap… The only thing that makes sense to me is that the Israelis are trying to lull Hezbollah into sleep so they can come after them later (not necessarily militarily). I don’t trust those bastards but if they truly are willing to make peace with Syria that would be a major blow. If they were to give up Shebaa farms, they’d take away Hezbollah’s last solid claim to being a resistance group. The other major issue is prisoners, and that’s now been addressed, to a certain extent. So while this is a symbolic victory for Hezbollah, in the long run, it could prove to be part of a greater victory for the mf Israelis… I don’t see them being particularly vulnerable.
As far as Kuntar is concerned, the whole issue is getting the same old cookie-cutter coverage we have become all too familiar with – only one side of the story is told. In one article he was referred to as sporting “a Hitlerian mustache and haircut” at his reception! I think Kuntar and the other freed prisoners are the only real winners.
On some of the other things that were said:
- I wouldn’t give so much credence to Christian support for Hezbollah. Sadly for us, most Lebanese are blind followers of their political masters. I can’t help but frown at a Aoun supporter who stands up for Nasrallah when a year before that he was hoping for his downfall. With the fucked up sociopolitical climate in Lebanon, Hezbollah does need other groups (especially after what happened in May).
- As far as their interests and those of their constituents are concerned, Hezbollah does work well in Lebanon’s messed up sectarian government. However, I don’t think that’s true in a general sense. Right now, Hezbollah is the singe most divisive issue in Lebanon. While it may not be in the open politically, the question of Hezbollah’s status is a major obstacle to the way the country is governed.
- Hezbollah’s reaction to what was happening at Nahr el Bared was understandable given the profile of Fatah Al Islam. Look at what’s happening in Tripoli. While both sides support the Palestinian cause, politically (and religiously) they don’t see eye to eye.Sunbula: i agree with Kalash that the only victors are the freed prisoners who can go back to their families, finally.
as far as hizballah’s nationalism is concerned, they are nationalist when they feel like it and when it suits them. and their nationalist discourse, at least if you watch al-manar is not one that i like. plus most of their rah rah military songs really suck. the only exception was “hala ya saqr libnan” which was done by a boy band in ramallah!Diana: I am very disappointed that Dalal was not buried in Palestine as her family wished (there were also 3 from the Galilee)…but maybe I am just being sentimental.
I cannot decide whether Hezb agreed to their release to Lebanon so that they could firmly demonstrate that they are the only real resistance movement and gain political points or for other reasons.
At least in the minds of most here, Hezbollah is a nationalist ARAB movement (indeed the only nationalist movement) defending not only Lebanon but Palestine. I was recently chatting with some PLO/Fatah folks who recounted the ‘good old days’ of the movement in the 70s. For them, the swap was like finally admitting that your cancer-ridden family member is dying and worthless while at the same time watching his/her spouse run off with a new younger, more attractive (wo)man.I must admit that I have been impressed with Manar TV – especially their detailed reports about the inner workings of the swap and its aftermath. That said, I still believe that Hezbollah acts in its interests, not in mine.
Quntar’s speeches were awesome and he kicked Haniyeh and Abbas’s asses on TV. (he publicly decried Haniyeh on Aqsa TV and called for Pal unity).
Tarik: The most disgusting part of it all is the kuntar dude. sick bastard– and the media is truly demonizing him as a viscous murderer (which he probably is), however the “reception” he received back in lebanon was that of a “hero”? can anyone confirm that? i cant believe that lebanese would be proud of a fool who basically hit several “soft” targets- it just seems so foolishly vengeful to me… to kill a family, that is- and the whole debacle gives the zio-media machine hella material to falsely portray israel as a truly benevolent, honest “neighbor” who makes painful sacrifices to the enemy in the name of “peace” and “reconciliation”- RIGHT?
Kalash: Kuntar’s release has important symbolic value for Lebanon – it’s not about him and his alleged crimes, it’s about the longest serving Lebanese prisoner in Israel. The Israelis are good at shaping news to their advantage and this time is no exception.
Part of the unfolding drama here has people stepping up pressure on Syria to release the Lebanese prisoners being held there. I can’t help but wonder if the Israelis had that in mind when they accepted to release Kuntar and company…
BTW, the latest product of the conspiracy theorists is that Israel released him so he could assassinate Nasrallah (or at least work as spy of some sort).Nimr: Clearly the returned lebanese were subjected to a mind control project (a la Project MK Ultra http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Project_MKULTRA). Next time things start getting a little hectic with the good ole party of god they will be activated!!! I mean come on… everone was thinking it. no? really?
Kalash: Not only that – after the release of these guys, there are no more Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails! Even countries like Jordan have some of their citizens locked up over there… Hezbollah showed that liberating Arab prisoners from Israel is not incumbent on any sort of
‘peace’ agreement… not only that, it can be achieved with blatant defiance of the Zionist regime. That is nothing to squawk at and should help comfort anyone who is taken aback by the official reception that Kuntar and co received.Remember also that there was no Hezbollah in Lebanon back in 1979…
Fayyad: So that makes Marwan Bargouthi a Manchurian Candidate?
Tarik: Marwan Barghouti… haha- ya I though he was the de facto president of the west bank? oh… wait… he isnt done with his mossad training yet…. woops
Will: My only comment is that we have to remember that Israel has internal
politics as well. The families of the soldiers mounted public campaigns pushing for some sort of deal to resolve it. Ehud Olmert is pretty weak politically and may have just moving with prevailing political winds. And since Hezbollah’s about to get hung out to dry with US-Israel moves against Iran and Syria, little deals like this are more likely now than later. Rather than see this as a win for Hezb, it could be a harbinger of their geopolitical isolation.Fayyad: I see the swap in the same light all the other deals took place in. Once Hezbollah captured the soldiers, the deal was going to take place, despite the tought talk of “we don’t negotiate with terrorists” that followed from the Israel’s, and especially after launching a foolish war and several commando raids to free them but failing.
It was just a matter of time, and the timing of this one, is just what Will explained, Olmert is very weeks, and public pressure was very strong in Israel, and accepting of swap deal, especially after the populations became diselusioned by invinsibility of their army and the ability to walk in, slap Hezbollah around and leave with the captured soldiers.
However, there are two minor detailes that make this swap unique. 1) Hezbollah fucked up earlier this year when it used force against other Lebanese, it lost much of its credibility, and having been provoked by western puppits like Hariri Jr. is no excuse. So it needed this deal to re-introduce itself as a “Resistance Movement”, the fanfare and the list of returning prisoners and remains point in that direction. Samir Kuntar is Durzi, and was a member of the PLO, Hezbollah’s march in celebration was joined by Durzi leader Walid Junblat, not exactly a friend over the last year or two. The remains include many Plaestinian and other Arab PLO fighters, including Dalal Almugrabi. Their funerals will be turned into massive shows of support and “affirmation of resistance” to “Israeli occupation”. The receptiopn at Beirut airport already included all Hezbollah’s political nemessis, including PM Senioran and Hariri. So this was a great tactical win for Nasrallah and co.
2) When Israel agrees to a such a deal, it turns gloomy for a few days, you can sense a mood of surrender, and the try to foget it a few days later, especially as they celebrate their wins from the deal. This time, instead of the gloomy mood being relieved by the return of the soliders, it go even worse as Israel’s got to see on TV that their returning soldiers are only remains in black coffins. They felt played by Hezbollah, whcih is evidant in the speaches of Israel leaders after the swap, several cabinet members who voted for the swap called for the assassination Kuntar, and Olmert himself launched a salvo of threats of attacking and destroying Hezbollah. Not t mention the phone calls the israeli military placed to residents of Southern Lebanon threatening them of attacks of they celebrate with Hezbollah.
Related posts:
- Palestinian deaths, the Sean Bell verdict, and Desentization-The Spitfire-side Chats
- Spitfire-side Chats: And the one millionth “suspected terrorist” wins…
- The Spitfire-side Chats: The Low Down on the High Value of “Low” and “Good” Numbers in the UAE and other Persian Gulf States
- LIVNI LA VIDA LOCA: Spitfire-side Chat
- Finger Pointing In The Aftermath Of Alan Johnston’s Release
You people are such cynicals fucks. Seriously. The animal bashed a little kid's head against a rock. "Soft target"? WTF is wrong with you?
Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2008, 3:39 pmI just can’t get over it. You have lost whatever credibility you had. It’s because this baby was Jewish, and this fucking animal is an Arab that you allow yourselves such language.
If there was a single human being on that stage where the fucking animal was paraded, they would have grabbed the nearest knife and cut his head off.
Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2008, 9:53 pmLittle late with the praise for Kuntar and Hezbollah, wouldn’t you say? What, were you worried you guys would discredit yourselves if you told us how you REALLY feel about people who kidnap and murder 4 year old girls?
And, sorry, but I didn’t see any “wide spectrum of opinion” there. The only difference of opinion re: HA amongst Kobabers seems to be how reliable their commitment to the Palestinian cause is? Sorry, gang. That’s not at all like what the real (civilized) world is talking about on this issue. Maybe you should watch something besides Al Jazeera English? (How’s the Arabic coming btw, WIll?)
Posted by programmer craig | July 27, 2008, 11:26 pmwhen nahr el-barid was being destroyed last year, they cheered for the Lebanese army
the prism through which you see the world is faulty. nahr el barid had nothing to do with palestinians. it was about sunni islamists who were rerouted by syria to lebanon, instead of being fed into iraq. they were being housed in the palestinian camps. these sunni islamists posed a threat to hezbollah, in fact they threatened the group leadership with assassinations and Iraq style IEDs and VBIEDs. their extermination was in hezbollah’s interests.
of course they were not exterminated. they were saved by the syrians and sunni factions and moved further north to continue training and organizing for the day that the syrians decide let them loose on hizbullah. iraq has demonstrated the preferred weapons of Arab sectarian war – al Qaeda style terrorism for sunna, death militia for shia
Posted by Anonymous | July 27, 2008, 11:32 pmPC, these are the same people who post every time a Palestinian gets a bruise at the hands of the zionist occupation army.
But a little girl’s head beaten against a rock with a rifle butt… that’s a “soft target”. But don’t worry, it’s not like he is gonna get some respect for that. you don’t get real respect until you kill a jew who can fight back.
a little girl was brutally murdered, but so what, this is just Israeli propaganda and reframing of the issue.
and then you wonder why the west calls you savages. barbarians. animals
i hope the team they send to kill him gets creative
Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2008, 12:05 amok,
1) hezbollah did NOT cheer on the lebanese army during nahr al bared. even while the palestinians were offering their support for the army, HA was calling the camp a “red line” and threatening the army against crossing into it.
it became politically untenable to outright oppose the army, but HA offered the least support, and most criticism, of any domestic party.
and btw — that’s not a good thing, and it has nothing to do with the palestinian cause.
Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2008, 6:50 am2) the celebrations for al-quntar (AKA al-cunt) were very much exaggerated by the media. yes, a few M14 pansies participated, but on a popular level almost no one outside hezb and other radical circles took part (i.e. no M14, but also no aouniyye to speak of, etc). this was not a national holiday with people dancing in the street, at least anywhere outside of the dahiyeh and abey. in fact, a huge proportion of people were disgusted and embarrassed by the return of quntar (the 4 POWs are a different story, everyone supported bringing them home).
also, it’s worth mentioning that of those who celebrated, the overwhelming majority either a) didn’t know the specifics of the allegations against quntar; or b) did not believe them to be true. (furthermore, as one of the kabobers noted, it was much more about hezb/nasrallah and closing the israeli prisoners file than about quntar himself.)
despite what PC would have you believe, only a tiny, universally reviled minority were actually celebrating quntar as a child murderer.
Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2008, 7:01 ami hope the team they send to kill him gets creativeWhat is this supposed to mean?
Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2008, 4:20 amonly a tiny, universally reviled minority were actually celebrating quntar as a child murderer.
Yes, and that minority is disproportionately overrepresented among the writers on this blog.
Posted by Mitch | July 28, 2008, 8:23 amNobody was celebrating Kuntar as a child murderer. If you’d bothered to read the actual post, that much would have been clear.
Posted by Mohammad | July 28, 2008, 8:28 amWhy are you getting defensive, Mohammad? I thought you said you support murdering Jews, ala “there’s no innocent Jew”, etc. The baby’s name, is Einat, and her father, who he shot through the neck and then drowned in front of his daughter to make sure he died was named Danny.
Posted by Mitch | July 28, 2008, 9:17 amI’m not getting defensive at all, merely pointing out that what you claimed we said is false and easily verifiable.
As is your baseless claim that I have declared support for the indiscriminate murder of Jews. Unless you can point readers to where I have said these things, you should shutup and stop embarrassing yourself.
Posted by Mohammad | July 28, 2008, 11:04 amMohammad,
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
Posted by Mitch | July 28, 2008, 12:02 pmMitch, how about you answer Mohammad. You dishonestly claimed that he supports the indiscriminate murder of Jews. Can your or can you not provide support for this horrific accusation. It appears that you cannot. Why are you so easily willing to lie about such a serious offense?
Posted by Anonymous | July 28, 2008, 12:42 pmI think one of the most disgusting forms of anti-Semitism in this day and age is the cheapening and exploiting of anti-Semitism by people like Mitch who hurl such an accusation disingenuously and dishonestly to silence other viewpoints.
Posted by Fadi | July 28, 2008, 12:52 pmNobody was celebrating Kuntar as a child murderer. If you’d bothered to read the actual post, that much would have been clear.
You’re right! They weer celebrating him as a hero! So the question is, why is a child murderer one of your heroes, mohammad? I personally find that more than a little disgusting, and it leaves you holding the bag the next time you want to whine about evil zionists. If an evil son of a bitch likes you thinks zionists are evil, that means they are good right?
Posted by programmer craig | July 28, 2008, 5:08 pmAnon, I am answering Mohammad’s assertion, by having him answer three simple questions.
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
But let him answer them here, in one place, for all to see, and we shall have the answer to his question.
Posted by Mitch | July 28, 2008, 6:50 pmI think one of the most disgusting forms of anti-Semitism in this day and age is the cheapening and exploiting of anti-Semitism by people like Mitch who hurl such an accusation disingenuously and dishonestly to silence other viewpoints.
But YOU won’t let that happen, will you, Fadi? You won’t let the voice of hatred for Jews be silenced. No, anti-semitism is only “legitimate” once there are 6,000,000 bodies in the ground. Then it is glorious to discuss one’s distaste for anti-semitism. Then it is a horror.
When a baby’s head is smashed in because she was Jewish, that is not anti-semitism. When people celebrate the animal who smashed her skull with a rifle butt, they are not anti-semites.
Anti-semitism really has a bad rap. All it means is, “against Jews”. That’s all. Why aren’t people who are “against Russians”, or “against Chinese” so linguistically abused?
It’s unfair when you think about it. You hate Jews, and that’s your prerogative, just like people who hate Russians or Chinese. Why should you be labeled some heinous name, while their hatred is considered acceptable? Take control! Be a PROUD anti-semite.
Posted by Sara | July 28, 2008, 7:05 pmWell, if “anti-Semitism” now means, as Zionists would like us to believe, a hatred for and opposition to occupation, ethnic cleansing, colonisation, land theft and water, the continued policy of apartheid, torture, indiscriminate killing of children playing football, arbitrary detention and routine harrassment of civilian populations, then I would indeed by proud of the definition…
Posted by Lowfields | July 28, 2008, 11:31 pmSo you are even more OK with total bigotry towards Arabs and Muslims, lowfields? Surely they must be more worthy of hate than Jews? Should somebody compile a list of all the reasons why it OK to engage in blind unthinking hatemongering towards Arabs and Muslims? Where should we begin? Most recent first? Or most ancient grievance?
Posted by programmer craig | July 29, 2008, 1:29 amMitch, I never made an assertion or asked a question. I’ve told you many times before already on your short time here on this blog, every time you say something you open yourself to more ridicule and expose the weakness of your position.
Sara, you pretty much proved Fadi’s point for him. In your limited mindset, Israelis can never do wrong. To suggest otherwise is obviously anti-Semitic and somehow a harbinger of another holocaust.
Again, none of us has defended the death of the girl-or even Kuntar’s reception. We were discussing it, and its sad how silly some of you look in falsely accusing us of making made up statements right under the post.
Posted by Mohammad | July 29, 2008, 7:48 amsara, what an insane, crazy rant. seek some medical attention immediately, you clearly have some head issues to figure out.
Posted by Anonymous | July 29, 2008, 8:28 am“So you are even more OK with total bigotry towards Arabs and Muslims…”
Moronic post as usual, Craig.
Of course it doesn’t mean that, but I’ll try to explain so even a former Marine can get it…
Unlike your crass comparison, I didn’t say “all Jews are deserving of hatred.” That would indeed be anti-Semitic, because not all Jews are accountable for the actions of a state, or other Jews who do suppport that state.
See?
However, what the Israelis and pro-Israel Jews are trying to do is expand – actually, abuse – the label of “anti-Semitism” to include anyone critical of the actions of Israel and the Zionist movement. It’s a juvenile attempt to stifle debate on the brutality and illegality of Israel’s 40-year occupation of the West Bank.
So, you see Craig – and I hope you’re still with me – this is about labels not racism.
I pointed out, and I repeat, that if people want to accuse me of being an “anti-Semite” because of my hatred of the policies of state-supported Zionism – which currently includes ethnic cleansing, apartheid and colonisation – then I am not only unmoved by it, I openly welcome it.
Posted by Lowfields | July 29, 2008, 8:46 amMohammad, why are you refusing to answer three simple questions? Why can’t you just be honest with us?
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
From now on, until you answer, these are to be known Mohammad’s Big Three Questions, or MBTQ, for short. I encourage all other commentators to present Mohammad with MBTQ every chance you are able to.
Posted by Mitch | July 29, 2008, 9:34 amBitch, answer these….
1) What is it about apartheid you particularly admire?
2) Was collective punishment a war crime the Israelis learned from the Nazis, or was it a tactic they discovered by themselves?
3) Is killing an entire family by dropping a 500lb bomb on an apartment building more or less abhorrent than bulldozing a home over a disabled man?
4) In South Lebanon, are cluster bombs the gifts that keep on giving?
5) When an Israeli writes a number on the inside of a Palestinian’s arm in black ink, do you think he can actually look at himself in the fucking mirror?
6) Do all Palestinian 10-year-olds playing football deserve to be shot?
7) When you see a video of a settler beating the shit out of man tied to a post, is your first reaction always to say: “Well, I don’t think this proves anything…”?
Posted by NOX | July 29, 2008, 11:46 amMohammad, why are you refusing to answer three simple questions? Why can’t you just be honest with us?
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
From now on, until you answer, these are to be known Mohammad’s Big Three Questions, or MBTQ, for short. I encourage all other commentators to present Mohammad with MBTQ every chance you are able to.
Posted by Mitch | July 29, 2008, 1:01 pmPoor poor logic Mitch, refusal to answer a question (particularly, such an offensive set of questions) does not equate to an affirmative response to these questions. It requires a special kind of stupid for anybody to take you seriously.
Posted by Fadi | July 29, 2008, 1:20 pmSimple questions. A decent human being could answer them with simple answers in ten seconds. I’ll give him one more day to respond. Otherwise, my assertions about his character will stand, unchallenged.
Mohammad, why are you refusing to answer three simple questions? Why can’t you just be honest with us?
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
From now on, until you answer, these are to be known Mohammad’s Big Three Questions, or MBTQ, for short. I encourage all other commentators to present Mohammad with MBTQ every chance you are able to.
Posted by Mitch | July 29, 2008, 5:12 pmMitch, why are you refusing tyo answer NOX’s questions…?
Particularly No.8….
Posted by Anonymous | July 30, 2008, 12:05 amSimple questions. A decent human being could answer them with simple answers in ten seconds. I’ll give him one more day to respond. Otherwise, my assertions about his character will stand, unchallenged.
Mohammad, why are you refusing to answer three simple questions? Why can’t you just be honest with us?
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
From now on, until you answer, these are to be known Mohammad’s Big Three Questions, or MBTQ, for short. I encourage all other commentators to present Mohammad with MBTQ every chance you are able to.
Posted by Mitch | July 30, 2008, 8:41 amSo let me get this straight Mitch; if somebody questions you on what evidence of anti-Semitism you have against Mohammed, your response will be that he refuses to answer your accusatory and offensive set of questions. Like I said, special kind of stupid.
Posted by Fadi | July 30, 2008, 9:17 amThese questions would only be “accusatory and offensive” for someone who knows that answering them truthfully will demonstrate his sadistic disregard for human life.
You are covering for him because I have touched a nerve. I was right. Mohammad supports the indiscriminate murder of Jews.
And if not… these are simple questions. A decent human being could answer them with simple answers in ten seconds. He has until the end of the day to respond. Otherwise, my assertions about his character will stand, unchallenged.
Mohammad, why are you refusing to answer three simple questions, hiding behind your cronies? Why can’t you just be honest?
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
From now on, until you answer, these are to be known Mohammad’s Big Three Questions, or MBTQ, for short. I encourage all other commentators to present Mohammad with MBTQ every chance you are able to.
Posted by Mitch | July 30, 2008, 9:58 amI haven’t been responding because unlike Mitch, I actually seem to have other things to do besides rabidly stalk and accuse people I have never met on blogs.
Anyway, Mitch, I hope you realize how absurdly silly you look. You made up a wild and extremely dangerous accusation against me, based on no evidence whatsoever. When pressed to provide such evidence, you refused, and instead challenged me to ‘prove’ my innocence by answering a set of questions. Let us ignore the outright illogic of your tactic, and focus on these questions. Questions, incidentally, that reveal your elementary inability to differentiate between Judaism and Israel.
Now, does anyone have anything to say about the actual topic?
Posted by Mohammad | July 30, 2008, 10:19 amI haven’t been responding because unlike Mitch, I actually seem to have other things to do besides rabidly stalk and accuse people I have never met on blogs.
Right. And KABOBfest isn’t all about the rabid and unsupported accusations, is it Mo?
Now, does anyone have anything to say about the actual topic?
I thought the topic was hatred of Jews? What am I missing?
Posted by programmer craig | July 30, 2008, 12:38 pmThree simple questions, Mohammad. You can evade them as long as you want, but the outcome is already clear. You are afraid to answer them and reveal yourself to be a virulent anti-semite, who relishes the indiscriminate murder of Jews. There is no other logical explanation.
Prove me wrong. How many chances have I now given you to do so? 10? 20? Just answer these three questions.
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
Posted by Mitch | July 30, 2008, 1:43 pmPC, read the post. That’ll tell you what the topic is:)
Posted by Mohammad | July 30, 2008, 2:03 pmI thought the topic was hatred of Jews? What am I missing?
The celebration of their murderers?
And the refusal of Mohammad to answer three questions:
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
Posted by Anonymous | July 30, 2008, 2:47 pm“There is no other logical explanation.”
Yep, and the refusal of Mitch to answer NOX’s questions shows that he is a champion of genocide, baby-killer and racist moron.
There is no other logival explanation.
Posted by Anonymous | July 31, 2008, 6:44 am“logival”….?
Not sure I would have quite phrased it like that…
But thanks for the “support”…
So, Mitch… where are my answers? Which of Israel’s policies do you prefer, ethnic cleansin, mass imprisonment or wholesale land theft…?
Posted by NOX | July 31, 2008, 6:46 amDay 3 of Mohammad refusing to answer three simple questions:
1) Do you support Hamas launching rockets and mortars at Israel?
2) Do you support Palestinians employing homicide bombers to target Israeli civilians?
3) Do you support the kidnapping of Israelis by Arabs?
We have no choice but to conclude that he does, in fact, support the indiscriminate murder of civilians – Jews in particular.
Posted by Mitch | July 31, 2008, 7:49 amDay three of mine, Bitch…
Which igives you the biggest hard-on, bulldozing a house over a disabled man or dropping a bomb on nine Gaza schoolchildren while they slept?
Posted by NOX | July 31, 2008, 8:00 amI dont know about Mitch, but I prefer screwing your little sharmoota mother, you son of a donkey’s fart.
Posted by Anonymous | July 31, 2008, 9:47 amI kissed your mom and I liked it-it
the taste of her cherry chapstick
I kissed your mom just to try it-it
hope your dad don’t mind it
It felt so wrong, it felt so right, don’t mean i’m gonna tap that bitch’s ass tonight
I kissed your mom and I liked it-it
And I liked it-it
Posted by Anonymous | July 31, 2008, 9:50 am