Wikipedia deletes Benjamin Emanuel entry

By QuiQui

Wikipedia has deleted Rahm Emanuel’s father’s page. Benjamin M. Emanuel’s entry was recommended for deletion shortly after Obama named the younger Emanuel as his Chief of Staff, and it looks like it had already been deleted (or recommended for deletion) once before in January of 2007.

“Benjamin M. Emanuel” is no longer searchable in Wikipedia, but the former-page can be accessed through the original URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_M._Emanuel

The old entry is no longer even in Google cache. The Progressive Mind was forward-thinking enough to save the original entry, including the original links. Here’s what is used say:
http://www.theprogressivemind.info/2008/11/benjamin-m-emanuel-wikipedia-free.html

And here’s a screenshot (from Blog-Reporter):

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Print this article!
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Tags: , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

8 Responses to “Wikipedia deletes Benjamin Emanuel entry”

  1. Jazakallah khair… very interesting…

    at least they are embarrassed

    #4595
  2. winston

    Down the memory hole.

    #4594
  3. wow, born in jerusalem in 1920? that makes him arab! or at least palestinian.

    #4593
  4. Anonymous

    unless he was a settler’s baby. they started coming in droves at that time.

    #4592
  5. Anonymous

    yup. he was of settler stock. his last name was “Auerbach”

    #4591
  6. Anonymous

    wow, it’s nice to see what arab activism has become.. snapshots of deleted wikipedia pages

    #4590
  7. renoona

    Umm.. it’s a satire blog, most definitely not a comprehensive representation of arab activism.. and it most definitely was not intended to be one.

    #4589
  8. Mr. Clean

    Wikipedia is influenced by Israeli sentiment, whether you like it, believe it or not. For instance, the entry on John P. Oneill doesn't mention that he quit after his superiors stonewalled his investigation into several terrorist cells that he had concluded had ties to Mossad. You'll find similar whitewashing of Wikipedia articles across the board. It's a form of lying by omission.

    #97387

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments