Wikipedia has deleted Rahm Emanuel’s father’s page. Benjamin M. Emanuel’s entry was recommended for deletion shortly after Obama named the younger Emanuel as his Chief of Staff, and it looks like it had already been deleted (or recommended for deletion) once before in January of 2007.
“Benjamin M. Emanuel” is no longer searchable in Wikipedia, but the former-page can be accessed through the original URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_M._Emanuel
The old entry is no longer even in Google cache. The Progressive Mind was forward-thinking enough to save the original entry, including the original links. Here’s what is used say:
http://www.theprogressivemind.info/2008/11/benjamin-m-emanuel-wikipedia-free.html
And here’s a screenshot (from Blog-Reporter):
Related posts:
- Rahm: Kneel Before the Awesome Power of the Arab-American Lobby
- Sinai Bedouins seek entry into Israel after clash with Egyptian police
- Abu Rahm Kicks Us in the Nards…
- ADC: Rahm and Barack Should Answer for Abu Rahm’s Statements
- Raji Sourani Denied Entry to US
Jazakallah khair… very interesting…
at least they are embarrassed
Posted by American Muslim Girl | November 13, 2008, 6:28 pmDown the memory hole.
Posted by winston | November 14, 2008, 1:33 amwow, born in jerusalem in 1920? that makes him arab! or at least palestinian.
Posted by Roba | November 14, 2008, 1:56 amhow so you retard? there has never been a Palestine. If anything it makes him a British Jew
Posted by nate | November 13, 2010, 7:00 pmYou're the fugly retard. There never was an Israel, Khazar!
Posted by abc | January 18, 2011, 8:35 pmunless he was a settler’s baby. they started coming in droves at that time.
Posted by Anonymous | November 14, 2008, 4:48 amyup. he was of settler stock. his last name was “Auerbach”
Posted by Anonymous | November 14, 2008, 5:59 amwow, it’s nice to see what arab activism has become.. snapshots of deleted wikipedia pages
Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2008, 10:11 amUmm.. it’s a satire blog, most definitely not a comprehensive representation of arab activism.. and it most definitely was not intended to be one.
Posted by renoona | November 18, 2008, 11:55 pmWikipedia is influenced by Israeli sentiment, whether you like it, believe it or not. For instance, the entry on John P. Oneill doesn't mention that he quit after his superiors stonewalled his investigation into several terrorist cells that he had concluded had ties to Mossad. You'll find similar whitewashing of Wikipedia articles across the board. It's a form of lying by omission.
Posted by Mr. Clean | January 11, 2010, 9:45 pmYou idiots. Irgun was considered terrorist to British as well as Americans to British during their fight for Independence. British did not want to give "Palestina" or what was Israel renamed by its occupants. Jews had to fight for their independence and all of that is exaggerated and "massacres" are exaggerated too.
Posted by Danielle | April 12, 2011, 6:36 pmThe others are already taken down too. What a bunch of thugs and crooks
Posted by flyonthewall | April 25, 2011, 5:30 pm