It seems the chaps at Jihad Watch (no relation to the Jihad Clock) are either running out of Jihadis to watch or are desperate for more political enemies to watch to death. They have a recent attack post targeting none other than Tzipi Livni, who they deem “still crazy.” I agree, but for different reasons. She’s zionutty.
Why do they say she’s crazy? She thinks land-for-peace is a formula worth pursuing.
They quote her since-corrected statement to Jewish leaders, “we need to give up half of the Land of Israel” for peace. I would have been shocked too. That was more of Palestine than the United Nations offered the Palestinians in the 1947 partition plan! Since they posted her quote, it was soon corrected by the AP. “Half” was downsized to “parts,” which admittedly is more than the “none” Netanyahu’s talking about.
And the Jihad Watch zionuts go along with his nothing-for-peace strategy.
Even in the updated version, the AP article still excluded “Jewish” from the title of the sponsoring group of the convention she addressed. The article calls it, “Conference of Presidents of Major American Organizations.” Hey now, not all Americans are Jewish. Just 2% of us. Man, the wire articles are more erroneous than blogs these days.
By the way, didn’t the font Jihad Watch uses on its header go extinct in 1998?
Related posts:
- Jihad Watch Goes Mainstream
- LIVNI LA VIDA LOCA: Spitfire-side Chat
- Carter Gives Lobby/Bush the Metaphorical Finger
- Abramoff Turns Canary
- Meet Baby Jihad
Here’s a concept for you to chew over, peace for peace. Live with it.
Posted by Anonymous | February 16, 2009, 7:00 pm“”Even in the updated version, the AP article still excluded “Jewish” from the title of the sponsoring group of the convention she addressed. The article calls it, “Conference of Presidents of Major American Organizations.” Hey now, not all Americans are Jewish. Just 2% of us. Man, the wire articles are more erroneous than blogs these days. “”
Why focus on this? It says ‘a Jewish group’ in the article. The implication you’re making that the AP is trying to hide some sort of ‘Jewish dual loyalties’ is rather sinister.
As far as how much of Palestine goes to one group of people or the other… shouldn’t the goal be getting the security situation to a place where peoplehood is unimportant, and nobody is concerned with the relative demographic trends of various groups?
Also, as far as which lands are given up… am I the only one who finds it significant that Israeli Arabs overwhelmingly say they’d rather live under the Israeli government than the PA or Hamas?
Posted by Joe | February 16, 2009, 10:11 pmThe Israeli Arabs say they’d rather live in Israel because they don’t want to leave their homes.
Palestinians only accept the 2 state solution because the Israelis wont accept the 1 state solution, where both people can live side by side. But the Israelis also reject any sort of viable 2 state solution.
And that is the problem.
Posted by Arayus | February 16, 2009, 10:27 pmGaza casualty figures.We've got another "Jenin massacre" on our hands. That's what you get for accepting the figures given by Hamas officials.
Posted by Anonymous | February 16, 2009, 7:26 pmThese pieces really set a standard in the iundtrsy.
Posted by Tibbie | August 7, 2011, 1:24 pmr2dugo wwcsidkzhron
Posted by evetcaowxtf | August 8, 2011, 4:46 amThe Israelis know that 1.200 people were killed, because they were the ones who killed them themselves. It just reminds me of the Americans and their reports that Iraq had "X" and "Y" amounts of WMDs. How did they know this? Because they were the ones who sold them to the Iraqis themselves.
IF anything, Israeli's numbers are just a fabricated as Hamas' figures. Why would anyone believe in number given reported by the Jerusalem Post, a conservative Israeli newspaper or the IDF??? This is just another numbers game like when the NY times reports that 600.000 Iraqis died since the American invasion in 2003, while the Washington Post affirms that only 150.000 died. Who do you believe??? If anything, the truth is somewhere in the middle: probably between 350.000 and 400.000. That's a lot of f^(%!n& people! And if anything, the Gaza numbers are probably the same thing: probably around 1.250 or so. So for anyone to believe the IDF of all people (the ones who actually pulled the triggers, pressed the buttons, and pulled lever to kill all those people and who probably came to those numbers on account of the books and logs they kept every time they killed a human being – Oh hey, I got me another filthy Palestinian. One less to worry about!) more than they do Hamas, is just as bad.
If anything, the truth is somewhere in the middle: 1.250 or so!
Still though, think about it. That's 1.200 souls that were lost. Israelis act as if that number is so small. What if the shoe were on the other foot and 1.200 Israelis died? Just think about it! It wouldn't be so nice, now would it.
Posted by Analyzer | February 17, 2009, 6:27 am“Why focus on this? It says ‘a Jewish group’ in the article. The implication you’re making that the AP is trying to hide some sort of ‘Jewish dual loyalties’ is rather sinister.”
La silly, it is about the fact that they are trying to say they somehow represent ALL Americans, when in fact it is a small minority… a minority which uses it’s title, as you do, to claim special rights and privileges not guaranteed to all. It’s sort of an UN-American concept actually…
Oh, and it doesn’t matter to you who gets what land because it’s not your fucking house or your grandfather’s vineyard where he is buried and where all the generations of your family lived and died as far back as they can be traced. To you it is a silly joke and you take huge things as worthless. You are the silly joke and you are what is worthless. Your solutions are empty, meaningless cliches. Just like you.
Posted by American Muslim Girl | February 17, 2009, 11:27 amIt’s sort of an UN-American concept actually…
We all know you are the expert on UN-American concepts, AMG
I mean, you converted to Islam and then moved to Egypt to be with your Egyptian husband and his family, instead of doing the normal thing and bringing his family here. I bet that’s why they hate you so much. You were supposed to be their ticket to the US, and instead you showed up on their doorstep, unemployed and obnoxious.
Posted by programmer craig | February 17, 2009, 11:45 am“”The Israeli Arabs say they’d rather live in Israel because they don’t want to leave their homes. “”
We’re not talking about anybody moving – we’re talking about territories having their control transferred from Israel to the PA.
Posted by Joe | February 17, 2009, 5:02 pm“”La silly, it is about the fact that they are trying to say they somehow represent ALL Americans, when in fact it is a small minority…”"
The article clearly said ‘a Jewish group’. Nobody is pretending that some Jewish group most people have never heard of represents ‘all’ Americans… except you.
“”a minority which uses it’s title, as you do, to claim special rights and privileges not guaranteed to all.”"
Waiiiitasecond. You’re saying that American Jews ‘claim special rights and privileges not guaranteed to all’? Explain how that’s *not* blatant anti-Semitism.
Posted by Joe | February 17, 2009, 5:04 pmJihadwatch is nothing but a conglomeration of inbred neo-nazis and likudnik kikes. A match made in Hitler’s hell.
If they are so against any peace, perhaps they can move to Israel and offer their services to fluff up the IDF terrorists.
Posted by Anonymous | February 18, 2009, 12:58 amJihadwatch is an incredibly valuable resource in tracking the Islamofascists that threaten to murder us all.
Posted by Anonymous | February 18, 2009, 7:50 amUhm no Joe, most Israeli-Arabs that are given the question are asked if they would move to a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.
Furthermore, the Palestinians that realize that being annexed to a Palestinian state would be realized don’t much like that reality at all. Mainly because current Israeli ideas of a Palestinian state is one without borders, with no military, no airspace, and no nothing. It would be little more than a ghetto autonomous region completely subject to Israeli whims. Who the hell would want to live in that?
Unless Israel is sincere about a 2 state solution one where there is a real independent state that is allowed to have borders with other countries and conduct its own affairs, the only solution will be a 1 state solution where everyone is an equal citizen of the state.
Posted by Arayus | February 22, 2009, 3:16 pm