// you're reading...

Uncategorized

Jury Still Out on the Juryless Military Commissions

Soldiers escort an enemy combatant

The War on Terror suffered a major lexical loss yesterday when the Obama administration tossed the legalistic euphemism, and Bush invention, “enemy combatant” into the dustbin of shameful history.

The Bush administration invented the term in order to circumvent preexisting legal structures that gave the accused an inconvenient array of rights.

Observers debated how significant a departure this move means for the overall program of American extraterritorial law enforcement/prosecution of those who use politically-motivated violence against institutions and individuals.

It did not set anyone free yet, and the resulting institutional framework is still taking shape, so it is hard to tell.

In filings, the kidnap victims previously known as “enemy combatants,” are now “detainees.” And non-citizen detainees have no great experience with the United States.

Some saw the detention camp has half-empty: “What’s important about it is it’s a plan on how they will evaluate Guantánamo detainees and future detainees,” said Eugene R. Fidell, -military law Professor at Yale University. “It sets the bar higher than it had been set in the Bush administration.”

Seeing the camp has half-full, the Center for Constitutional Rights said dropping the term “enemy combatant” was hardly a change.

“They have adopted almost the same standard the Bush administration used to detain people without charge — with one change, the addition of the word `substantially’ before the word ‘supported.’ This is really a case of old wine in new bottles.”

I tend to agree with CCR until we see the actual effects. It will take time for the nature of the change to be fully understood. For instance, what is substantial support. Some may say this post substantially supports Al-Qaeda just for questioning the country’s policies.

The machinery of injustice is a lot faster than its counterpart, especially when it comes to the War on Terror. With the United States, I presume the change won’t be “substantially” — to borrow the government’s new word — different.

With Obama’s intention to close the camps at Guantanamo, and now dropping this term from its paperwork, the fate of the military commissions that Congress established to try Guantánamo detainees for alleged war crimes is still an open question. Obama suspended these travesties of justice shortly after taking office.

The military commission law says that only “alien unlawful enemy combatants” can be tried at the Guantánamo war court. Will the law need to be changed to include detainees? Or does the Obama administration intend their end?

The Obama administration position, according to a Military Commissions spokesman, “very much contemplates the existence of ‘enemy combatants’ and justifies detention at Guantánamo on that basis under the laws of war.”

So, only Muslims apparently violate the laws of war now. It looks like the rule of law won’t do much better even with a law professor as president.

Still, some hail this as the beginning of the unraveling the Bush administration’s kangaroo legal structure.

As CCR warns, it could be old wine in new bottles. I estimate it will be watered down old wine in shiny, new, well-marketed bottles. And the Obama administration will likely move in very slow steps, testing the political winds and legal ramifications each way.

Obama will strike down the most objectionable and glaring faults, but leave the American imperial, politically-grounded, imperial quasi-judiciary in place. It is enough that the American military dominates so many beyond this nation’s borders, why play legal games with the administration of justice — it is a transparent attempt to give the whole stinky enterprise the facade of legality.

Filed Under  , , , , , ,

Discussion

No comments yet.

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

question mark
Ever wonder what Bashar Al-Trump would look like?
December 17, 2015
By Guest
[John Locher / AP]
Top 5 Missing Things: The GOP Debate
December 16, 2015
By Guest
Jesus, Jesus was hot.
What Jesus Really Looked Like
December 15, 2015
By Guest
Israeli pigs
Zionist Pigs… Literally
December 14, 2015
By Guest
Demonstrators protest against Syria's President Bashar al-Assad after Friday prayers in Kafranbel, near Adlb, December 23, 2011. Picture taken December 23, 2011. REUTERS/Handout (SYRIA - Tags: POLITICS CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT) FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR SALE FOR MARKETING OR ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS. THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. IT IS DISTRIBUTED, EXACTLY AS RECEIVED BY REUTERS, AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS
Worst New Syrian Tax Ever
December 11, 2015
By Guest
hate crime
Possibly the Most American Hate Crime of All Time
December 10, 2015
By Guest
syrianchildren
What Anti-Muslim Rhetoric is Missing: Reality
March 23, 2015
By admin
Assad - Syrian Monster2
Oh the Horror of the Syrian Regime…
September 25, 2012
By Nabil
israel-against-iran-war
So, Who’s the Threat to America Again?
August 20, 2012
By Guest
So where do we keep Islamophobia?
Where Do We Keep Islamophobia?
August 15, 2012
By Shubnum
 Source: http://bilgrimage.blogspot.com/2011/12/usccb-political-lobbyists-or-advocates.html
Lobbying Versus Advocacy
August 1, 2012
By Mehrunisa
Jesus Is Alive At Speaker's Corner
On the destruction of Speaker’s Corner
July 17, 2012
By Abubakr
Picture 1
Stateless & Speechless, A Palestinian Regains Speech
July 12, 2012
By Hanitizer
Tyrone in a position of traditional Black prayer
White, Black American groups ‘swap’ summer interns
July 10, 2012
By Guest
200134410-001
The Costs of Stripping
June 25, 2012
By Mehrunisa