There’s a common logical fallacy known as a “red herring.” It’s essentially an inflammatory point that is true, but irrelevant. Red herrings are used commonly in fictional murder mysteries. When cleverly placed they can trick the most seasoned mystery reader. You know, the wealthy victim’s wife was sleeping with an accountant who had money problems. Positive motive, and subtly placed, but completely irrelevant.
Come be a part of our absurdity.
A revolution takes time.
Ali Abdullah Saleh finally signed the GCC initiative on Wednesday; does it mean the end of months of protest, and victory for the Yemeni revolution?
A little known poem penned by one of the world’s best selling poets, Gibran Kahlil Gibran, in the July 1926 issue of “Syrian World” (NYC’s first Arab American English newspaper):
Yeah, that’s pretty much it. Enjoy.
Tawakkol Karman, Yemeni Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, at the University of Michigan.
New York Times reporters are truly on the cutting edge. They dig deep. They unearth the worms. They uproot the, well, roots. Everybody else is too lazy, or too stupid, to do any serious journalism. Everybody else covers the same old Negative Nancy material. They cover dance. And stuff.
Tunisia`s example demonstrates that we cannot necessarily assume that Islamism can only lead to an oppressive proverbial harem for women (and even men) or that and secularism is the only route to achieve good.
Or maybe it doesn’t. Or maybe it does. Perhaps, it doesn’t.