tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6358737.post-38072736065998651992008-02-17T10:07:00.000-08:002008-02-17T10:07:00.000-08:002008-02-17T10:07:00.000-08:00<I>I've watched the Syrian station part of the vedio. Funny how you call any critcism against the American occupation of Iraq "Baathist perspective". Why don't you call it "Iraqi widows perspective"?</I><BR/><BR/>"Meanwhile in occupied Iraq" - not just Iraq.<BR/><BR/>"A roadside bomb targeting a US military convoy exploded killing 4 Iraqis including 2 women, and injuring 6 others"<BR/><BR/>You see how the bomb wasn't INTENDED to kill Iraqis, in their version of the story?<BR/><BR/>"In addition 8 Iraqis including a woman were killed and 10 others were wounded in sporadic attacks in Baghdad..."<BR/><BR/>They make it sound like Americans carried out those attacks. Why?<BR/><BR/>I could go on, but seriously... why bother? That was all in the first 20 seconds of the coverage.<BR/><BR/>Does it make you feel good to listen to news that consists of outright lies interspersed with gross distortions, b-cell?<BR/><BR/>Is it the "Iraqi Widows perspective" to believe in falsehoods?<BR/><BR/>That Syrian station is just a mouthpiece for the Sunni insurgency. <BR/><BR/>Sunni insurgency is almost dead, by the way. Syria better get with the program before it's too late, don't you think?programmer craighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17566950406349754166noreply@blogger.com