Showing posts with label arab league. Show all posts
Showing posts with label arab league. Show all posts

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Meanwhile, Aljazeera Faces Inquisitions In Morocco

While Al-Jazeera English fights for its right to remain on Vermont as Will and Hanaan highlight, and fend off spear attacks by neocons and zionuts, it fights another battle to protect its rights and staff in Morocco.


The trial of Al Jazeera's bureau chief in Morocco, on charges of conspiracy and spreading false information, has resumed after a stormy first hearing on Tuesday.

Mohammed el-Alaoui, the presiding judge, had rejected an appeal by the defence team for more time to better prepare for the case, giving lawyers for Hassan Rachidi only three days to get ready.

The second court session opened at the Rabat First Instance Court on Friday.

In May, Morocco suspended Al Jazeera's daily television news bulletin covering the Maghreb countries (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Mauritania) from its studios in the Moroccan capital.

The decision, according to Khalid Naciri, the Moroccan communication minister and spokesman for the government, was due to technical and legal issues.

Rachidi is facing prosecution under Article 42 of the country's press code.
I love how in the news round up at the end of the Vermont debate video below, the story of efforts in the US to ban Al-Jazeera from air waives gets brilliantly rolled up with stories of China and Zimbabwe’s crack downs on the freedom of press.

Read More...

Monday, May 19, 2008

Pointers President Bush Missed

Yesterday, President Bush spoke to Arab and Muslim leaders, businessmen, and others at the World Economic Forum in Egypt. President Bush's sure-to-be-ignored laundry list of reforms the Arab states should undergo missed a few really important pointers:

1) Arab states must close all legally dubious island prisons in other countries that hold individuals as "enemy combatants" or any other fictionalized classification.

2) Arab states must end all unwelcome, foreign military occupations, especially those that threaten to fragment nations and politically destabilize regions.

3) Arab states must stop incarcerating millions of people for small crimes, especially when the prisoners tend to come from impoverished, minority groups.

4) Arab armies should cease the recruitment and training of minors.

5) Arabs must stop polluting the world environment, consuming an exorbitant share of the world's resources, and end its generally gluttonous personal intake of food.

6) Arab states must close their hundreds of military bases around the world.

Perhaps these key points did not make it into his speech so he could dedicate more time to praising Israel and dishing out empty platitudes feigning support for Palestinian independence.

Read More...

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Marwan Kraidy on Arab Media Charter

Last month, most of the Arab states, led by Egypt and Saudi Arabia, came to an alarming agreement on regulating satellite broadcasting in Arab countries. It proposes further extending state controls over satellite channels in such a way that could temper political dissent. The impact is yet to be seen, but is not surprising given these governments' denial of basic freedoms and intolerance for independent thinking.

Marwan Kraidy, Professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication, wrote a piece about it for Carnegie’s Arab Reform Bulletin:

After years of rhetoric about the need for a pan-Arab satellite television framework, Arab information ministers on February 12, 2008 adopted a charter that provides the tools to penalize broadcasters who attack leaders or air socially unacceptable content. The charter is broad ranging, covering news, political shows, and entertainment—even sports programs. In the weeks before the emergency meeting in Cairo, the Egyptian and Saudi information ministers lobbied their colleagues to pass the document, prepared by a committee of experts during the preceding six months. Even Syria, currently engaged in a media war with Saudi Arabia over Lebanon, signed off on the charter.
Read On.

Read More...

Monday, November 05, 2007

We Welcome Pakistan to the League of Perpetual Emergency Law States

On behalf of several Arab states, the Palestinian Authority and Israel, KABOBfest welcomes Pakistan to the exclusive club of states under emergency law. Though these are long-time members of this esteemed, exceptional group, a Musharraf-led Pakistan should fit right in.

Emergency law is such a nice way to negate implementation of high-handed ideals enumerated in Constitutions -- unless you are Israel, which has no constitution. Instead it has arguably non-binding "Basic Laws" that are also inapplicable during times of emergency law and leave out key democratic freedoms such as such as the Right for Equality, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Protest, and others. Israel has been in a state of emergency since its birth. After all, it still has the natives to deal with. This means for Palestinians, it is martial law, whereas Jews experience order and predictable legality. In sum, it's apartheid.

In solidarity, and to deal with the greatest threat to KABOBfest security, I declare a state of emergency for this blog. I am suspending open commenting access, will rigorously edit and screen posts, and am cutting down on flirtatious dalliance on the KABOBfest e-mail listserv until the "anonymous" terrorists attacking us in the comments section halt their assaults.

Read More...

Saturday, May 19, 2007

UAE announces $10bn education fund

From Middle East Times

SHUNEH, Jordan -- United Arab Emirates (UAE) Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Saturday announced the creation of a $10 billion fund to promote education in Arab countries, at a World Economic Forum meeting in Jordan.

"I have decided to establish the Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation to focus on human development, and I have pledged an endowment of $10 billion to finance its projects," he told participants of the gathering on the shores of the Dead Sea.

"[This] personal initiative aims at contributing to the development of a knowledge-based society, by supporting and empowering young minds and focusing on research, education, and investment in the infrastructure of knowledge," said Sheikh Mohammed, who is also ruler of the booming emirate of Dubai.

The foundation will launch a fund for research and set up research centers in the region, and in 2008 will begin providing scholarships to send students to world-reputed universities and institutes.

"There is a wide knowledge gap between us and the developed world in the West and in Asia. Our only choice is to bridge this gap as quickly as possible, because our age is defined by knowledge," he added.

Jordan's King Abdullah II opened the three-day forum Friday with an appeal to politicians and business leaders to help end Middle East violence and prepare for the "day after peace" in the region, where more than half the population is young.

Of the 325 million people living in the Arab world, more than 200 million are under 24, the king said.

"These young men and women deserve to be part of a prospering region that is playing its rightful role on the world stage," the king added.

More than 1,000 participants from 50 countries are attending the annual forum which aims to advance economic diversification and promote peace in the troubled Middle East.

Read More...

Monday, March 12, 2007

Would The West Adopt Democracy If It Were This Hard?

Election workers in Mauritania counting the votes under the light of a kerosene lamp after the first presidential elections in which a sitting president did not run. (Reuters)

Less than two years ago, colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall led a bloodless coup against then president Muawiya Weld Taye', a much disliked, chronic president ousting him and sending him into exile. Taye's presidency witnessed rampant corruption, widespread discrimination and oppression of minorities, retreating economy, and normalization of relations with Israel.

Like many military coup leaders, Vall promised swift free elections and reforms. Unlike many coup leaders, he actually carried through with his promise, holding free and fair elections, in which he and other military generals barred themselves from standing.

"Mauritania really can serve as an example for the rest of Africa. Only 19 months after a coup, you have all the stages of democracy. It's too good to be true, but it's happening," Vijay Makhan, special envoy for the African Union, told reporters.

Read more about Mauritania's experience.

Read More...

Monday, January 22, 2007

America's "Moderate Arab Ally"

The description of the grainy video sounds like it could be referring to a horror movie:

The man in the video lies on the floor on his back, naked from the waist down, with his feet hoisted into the air, surrounded by pairs of anonymous black boots.

The camera captures an act of brutality before zooming in until the man's face, scrunched with agony, fills the frame. He cries out for mercy from his tormentors, but within seconds the words give way to screams of desperation. The abuse continues, and the camera holds steady
The video, which made its way around YouTube, exposes the harsh reality of Egypt's many Abu Ghraibs. Torture remains a huge problem there, both as a means of silencing dissent and as of collective punishment. Egypt deserves better than such regimes. When will American policy reflect human rights? The problem actually is that America's biggest allies follow its lead, torturing and victimizing people as a basis for ruling them.

Read More...

Friday, January 19, 2007

Jordan Seeks Nuclear Power. Israelis Crap pants.

Word on the streets is that King Geordi La Forgeor err uh Abdullah – recently told an Israeli newspaper (Ha’aretz) that Jordan is seeking to develop a national nuclear program – for peaceful purposes of course.

But, the rules have changed on the nuclear subject throughout the whole region. Where I think Jordan was saying, 'we'd like to have a nuclear-free zone in the area,' after this summer, everybody's going for nuclear programs.

The Egyptians are looking for a nuclear program. The GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] are looking at one, and we are actually looking at nuclear power for peaceful and energy purposes.
I wonder how this is gonna sit with American and Israeli officials who have been so desperately trying (and failing) to coax Iran into abandoning its uranium enrichment / Holocaust denial program. Actually wait, no – I take that back. What I meant to say is, I wonder how this is gonna sit with those ridiculously whiney Israeli hawks and lobbyists in DC that everyone knows – but are just too afraid to admit – indirectly set the agenda for US foreign policy in the Middle East.

In Jordan’s defense (and I use that term loosely), it – along with Egypt – has enjoyed a peaceful and cooperative relationship with Israel for a significant number of years. In fact, using nuclear power to intimidate Israel couldn't be any further from King Abdullah’s mind (and ginormous head).
I personally believe that any country that has a nuclear program should conform to international regulations and should have international regulatory bodies that check to make sure that any nuclear program moves in the right direction.
Ooh, great opportunity to badmouth the ethno-exclusive apartheid state: Israel doesn’t "conform" to any such "international regulations" on nuclear energy!

But still – will the West play ball? Does it really have a choice? Will King Abdullah make another cameo appearance on Star Trek: Voyager? These are the types of burning questions that keep me up at night!

Personally – I think that Jordan has been kissing American and Israeli ass for far too long to be denied the opportunity to develop (or be punished for creating) a national nuclear energy program. Seriously, how would it look to the Arab masses if even Jordan and Egypt’s sell-out governments are treated like Iran when it comes to such matters? Doing so would only create (or help solidify) the impression that whether Arab states cooperate with Zio-American imperialism or not, they'll still always be side-swiped by American-Israeli relations.

But in a region where contempt for unjust American and Israeli policies runs rampant among a very young populace that is becoming increasingly frustrated with its corrupt leadership… can the West really afford to give its blessing for such a project – or at the very least – turn a blind eye?

It appears that what Iran has done is help spark the beginning of a Mid-East arms race. Politically speaking, this may or may not prove to be a bad thing - as mutually assured destruction can once again even out the playing field for regional contenders (not that there are many).

But what about Israel? Here's one possible scenario: King Abdullah's hot Palestinian wife, Queen Rania, withholds access to her royal hiney-ness until her husband promises to use his new found nuclear power to intimidate Israel into ending its repression of Palestinian human rights.

Hmmm, but that's not very likely because everyone knows that nuclear-ly wiping Israel off the face of the planet would pretty much obliterate Jordan (and Palestine, and Lebanon, and Syria) too. Damn. Maybe all King Abdullah really does want is better electricity... to power his very own custom built high-performance Starship Enterprise!!!

Read More...

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Why I Love Jordanians: Reason 1,948



What did you think their soldiers were doing - freeing Palestine? HA!

Read More...

Monday, November 13, 2006

Those Spineless Arab Leaders

Arab foreign ministers meeting in Cairo yesterday to discuss the US veto against a resolution condemning the Israeli massacre against civilians in Beit Hanoun took what could be mistaken for a courageous move; they decided to break the Israeli-led sanctions against the Palestinians since they democratically elected Hamas to lead the government in January.

Last week, I spoke of sinking ships. If you think the veto is the iceberg and the breaking of sanctions is the dent in the hull, don’t get excited. The real, costly consequences of US’s endorsement of Israeli state terrorism will not come from the current Arab leaders, but it is in the making.

This seemingly bold move is nothing more than a hollow act of apparent retaliation against the US veto. It is highly unlikely the Arab states dared to break away without receiving the green light from the US. To clarify, Fatah and Hamas, in other words, President Mahmoud Abbas and the cabinet led by Ismail Haniya reached an agreement on a unity government were the deal reportedly included western (presumably US and European) guarantees to end the economic sanctions and boycott against Palestine.

So, embarrassed by the US’s veto, which effectively is an endorsement of the Israeli massacre, Arab leaders sought to save face and apparently the US agreed to throw them a bone by allowing them to claim credit for rescinding the sanctions that are to be ended or phased out in the near future.

This of course is a best case scenario, if history is any guide, there is a better chance that this stunt is only a, well, stunt, a political maneuver that is meant to appease and absorb public anger in the Arab street until the next news item occupies the headlines.

Nonetheless, I give the foreign ministers an 'A' for managing to convene a meeting in a matter of a day or two.

Read More...