CONTACT: http://judiciary.house.gov/Contact.aspx
It has been requested recently that letters urging Dr. Al-Arian's release be sent to Judge Gerald Lee of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, to Attorney General Michael Mukasey and to congressional leaders.
Supporters are also being asked to write letters directly to Dr. Al-Arian.
Please write:
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 307-6777 Fax
askdoj@usdoj.gov
Glenn A. Fine, Inspector General
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
House Judiciary Chair:
The Honorable John Conyers, Jr
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126
(202) 225-0072 Fax
john.conyers@mail.house.gov
Senate Judiciary Chair:
Senator Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-4242
senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
To contribute to Dr. Al-Arian's legal defense, please send checks to:
National Liberty Fund
P.O. Box 1211
24525 E. Welches Road
Welches, OR 97067
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
This Could Happen to Anyone- Get It? His Rights Are Our Rights.
Permalink
| 6
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: academic freedom, activism, american politics, arab-americans, civil rights, Emily, human rights, law, sami al-arian, video, war of terror, war on terror
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
So Sue Me
Five Israeli reservists who took part in the incursion into and destruction of a large part of the Jenin refugee camp in 2002 are suing the maker of a documentary for making them look bad.
Jenin, Jenin director Mohammed Bakri testified that everything in the film is true. The litigants claimed that selective editing made it appear that a tank purposefully ran over a group of Palestinians.
What a joke!
Judge Michal Nadav of the Petah Tikva District Court recommended the parties reach an agreement. The claimants want 2.5 million shekels in this defamation suit. Such a flimsy suit would never fly in places with defamation laws protecting free speech.
Italian filmmakers have organized a petition in defense of Bakri. Unfortunately, Israeli and Arab artists have done very little to support him. About the Italian petition, Bakri said, "I hope that this initiative will reach the hearts of the good people of Israel. I think it sends a message to Israeli artists, who should have stood by me, not one of whom, Arab or Jew, lifted a finger."
If the reservists suffered a loss of reputation for their involvement in "Operation Defensive Shield," maybe they should sue the Israeli government for making them do it. Jenin is under occupation, and such Israeli operations against refugee resistance fighters will always be seen as a crime of occupation. The IDF is what made them look bad.
They could also sue the bulldozer operator, also a reservist, who took pride in his 75 hour rampage bringing down as many homes as he could:No one refused an order to knock down a house. No such thing. When I was told to bring down a house, I took the opportunity to bring down some more houses; not because I wanted to - but because when you are asked to demolish a house, some other houses usually obscure it, so there is no other way. I would have to do it even if I didn't want to. They just stood in the way. If I had to erase a house, come hell or high water - I would do it. And believe me, we demolished too little. The whole camp was littered with detonation charges. What actually saved the lives of the Palestinians themselves, because if they had returned to their homes, they would blow up.
Wow, he was so concerned for the well-being of the Palestinians. Isn't that sweet? If he really cared about them, he would advocate for ending the occupation.
Permalink
| 4
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: documentaries, films, israel, law, palestine, Will
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Sami Al-Arian's Nightmare Continues
Yesterday, Dr. Sami Al-Arian was informed he will be called to testify before a third grand jury. Having passed the 5th year anniversary of his imprisonment, the government continues to hold him despite their inability to prosecute him.
After a lengthy trial in which he was not found guilty, the government is keeping him as a "material witness," which Dr. Al-Arian's lawyers argue is in direct contravention to an agreement they struck last April. Holding material witnesses can be an arbitrary exercise in prosecutorial power (giving them the ability to detain those they have no evidence again). He thus refuses to testify, and has engaged in hunger strikes that cost his health severely. With this announcement, he decided to go on another strike.
Dr. Al-Arian is clearly a political prisoner being punished for nothing more than the substance of his ideas and activism. His imprisonment is a sham, again showing that the American "justice" system is flawed by ethnic bias. The court's ideological orientation values Islamophobic alarmism and anti-Palestinianism over the US Constitution (i.e. while giving money to the Israel army can be a tax write-off, giving money to Palestinian militant groups, as he was charged with, is illegal). This explains this case's contradictions of the law's premises of due process and fair treatment.
See his website
Help the campaign to free him
Permalink
| 18
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: law, sami al-arian, war of terror, war on terror, Will
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
DC Premiere: The United States' Persecution of Dr. Sami Al-Arian

Laila Al-Arian wrote a fascinating summary full of insights about the award-winning documentary film about the “terrorism-trial” of her father, professor Sami Al-Arian. The essay, written for the Huffington Post, is an intimate review of USA vs. Al-Arian. Kudos to Huffington Post for running it.
If you live in or near Washington DC, you can see the film Wednesday, December 5th with a panel discussion after the film.
From the film's blurb:
“USA vs Al-Arian” is a disturbing film on freedom of speech in post 9/11 America and political persecution. The film follows the arrest and trial of Sami Al-Arian, an Arab-American university professor accused of supporting a terrorist organization abroad. For two and a half years Dr. Al-Arian was held in solitary confinement, denied basic privileges and given limited access to his attorneys. The film is an intimate family portrait documenting how a tight-knit family unravels before our very eyes as trial preparations, strategy and media spin consume their lives. Norwegian director Line Halvorsen has made a damning portrait of the case focusing on the trial’s emotional toll. This is a nightmare come to life, as a man is prosecuted for his beliefs rather than his actions.The film presents the direct testimony of jurors who recounted the pressure they received from prosecutors, as well as the general emptiness of the charges. Ron, a juror, said, "We decided that there was no evidence. It wasn't that it was weak or poorly constructed. It just wasn't there. Political beliefs, personal beliefs, social beliefs, but I saw no evidence of anybody doing anything that they were accused of."
Al-Arian's story is ultimately about the excess and lunacy of a war on terror that criminalizes political activity to the detriment of the First Amendment and the Israelization of American law -- he was never accused of anti-American activities, just anti-Israeli terrorist organizing. So now America's in the business of sacrificing the First Amendment for Israeli security. How comforting.
See the event's website
Permalink
| 5
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: activism, films, law, media, sami al-arian, war of terror, Will
Friday, February 16, 2007
Dr. Sami Al-Arian Collapses from Hunger Strike
Action - Write Letters in Support of Dr. Al-Arian
Imprisoned Florida professor collapses on 23rd day of hunger strike
CAIR ACTION ALERT #507
WRITE LETTERS IN SUPPORT OF DR. AL-ARIAN
Imprisoned Florida professor collapses on 23rd day of hunger strike
(WASHINGTON D.C., 2/15/07) - The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is calling on American Muslims and other people of conscience to write letters in support of Dr. Sami Al-Arian, a former Florida professor currently on a hunger strike in federal detention to protest his treatment by U.S. authorities.
Family members report that Al-Arian collapsed on the 23rd day of his fast and has been moved from Virginia to a medical facility in North Carolina.
Al-Arian began his hunger strike more than three weeks ago after being given a sentence of up to 18 months for refusing to testify before a grand jury in Virginia. His attorneys say an earlier plea agreement freed him from further cooperation with the government. Supporters say the government's actions amount to a form of harassment.
read on and do something!
Permalink
| 3
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: activism, american politics, law, palestine, sami al-arian, war on terror, Will
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
KABOBfast for Dr. Al-Arian
In solidarity with Dr. Sami Al-Arian's hunger strike -- which we wrote about a few days ago -- KABOBfest will not publish any posts on Thursday and Friday.
We consider the continued denial of his freedom an unjust crime. A jury heard the case against him and did not accept the government's case. The government should not continue to keep him from his family and friends. Being in prison for four years on charges the government cannot prove is bad enough. To force him to hunger strike AGAIN to bring attention to the wrong against him is an egregious abrogation of human decency, not to mention the US Constitution's due process rights.
Also, I will be fasting for twenty-four hours Thursday to Friday in protest. I encourage others to join in as well.
Dr. Al-Arian began his hunger strike on January 22, 2007 to protest continued government harassment. For more information on why Dr. Al-Arian is on a hunger strike, please visit: www.freesamialarian.com.
Permalink
| 6
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: law, sami al-arian, Will
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Hunger Strike for Dr. Sami Al-Arian
Dr. Sami Al-Arian, the former professor Steve Emerson and the government accused of being a terrorist, remains imprisoned by the US government, despite their failure to convict him. Instead of freeing him, a vindictive government prosecutor (read: loser) is keeping him holed up to testify in other cases, despite the terms of a plea bargain.
To protest his continued, baseless detention, he is on his 15th day (and counting) of a hunger strike in his quest for justice. Thirty-eight people are now participating in a rolling Hunger Strike to show support for him.
I will join this hunger strike, and you should as well to show solidarity with a man convicted of nothing, yet imprisoned now for nearly 4 years. His alleged crime was being a Palestinian connected to a group using violence against a violent occupier. Such hypocritical laws are the basis for political imprisonment rather than the service of justice.
Dr. Al-Arian began his hunger strike on January 22, 2007 to protest continued government harassment. For more information on why Dr. Al-Arian is on a hunger strike, please visit: www.freesamialarian.com.
Those who would like to participate in the Hunger Strike are asked to send an e-mail to tampabayjustice@yahoo.com with the day they will fast.
Hopefully by participating in this together, we will encourage ourselves and others to join in solidarity and will help raise awareness of the continued injustice against Dr. Al-Arian.
----
Other ways to help:
Please write to the following individuals listed on the following link to ask for an immediate end to Dr. Al-Arian's suffering:
http://www.freesamialarian.com/help.htm
Permalink
| 5
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: activism, american politics, law, palestine, sami al-arian, Will
Saturday, May 13, 2006
Al-Arian Suffers Under Deplorable Prison Conditions
Tampa Bay Coalition for Justice and Peace
May 11, 2006
Tampa-
The persecution of Dr. Sami Al-Arian in the U.S. prison system continues. Last Thursday, May 4, Dr. Al-Arian was hauled from Orient Road Jail in Tampa at 3:45 a.m. to a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. He was placed in the Special Housing Unit (SHU), a section of the prison reserved to temporarily house convicted inmates who violate prison rules. Prison administrators said they received a letter, believed to be from federal marshals, which contained the ridiculous allegation that Dr. Al-Arian is a danger to other inmates. This claim was made to justify the torturous conditions under which Dr. Al-Arian has been placed in Tallahassee.
Dr. Al-Arian's family, supporters and all people of conscience would be shocked and outraged by this claim because Dr. Al-Arian is a well-known community leader, respected professor, and political prisoner, who not only has no connection to violence but was acquitted by 12 jurors of any connection to violence after a 6-month trial last December. Even the government conceded in its plea deal with Dr. Al-Arian that he has no connection to violence.
Once again, Dr. Al-Arian is being held in solitary confinement, a constant in his three and a half year imprisonment. Violent, hardened criminals are given more rights and treated more humanely than Dr. Al-Arian. He is clearly being subjected to especially harsh conditions because of his political beliefs, ethnicity and religion. It is further evident that this vindictive treatment is a deliberate attempt to break him physically and psychologically.
Furthermore, as he has no watches or clocks, Dr. Al-Arian feels disoriented and cannot properly carry out the five daily Muslim prayers. He was only able to leave his cell twice in one week for one hour each; the law states that inmates in solitary confinement must be given one hour a day. He was allowed only one phone call with his family, exactly a week after he was moved. His family was extremely worried and distraught when they did not hear from him for a week. Moreover, Dr. Al-Arian was not able to contact his attorneys, nor were they able to reach him to discuss pressing legal issues with deadlines that passed during the week he was deprived from communication.
In the course of his detention and during the critical time preparing for his trial, Dr. Al-Arian spent 27 months in the SHU unit of Coleman Federal Penitentiary. The legal limit of placing regular inmates in the SHU is one year. Again, the stark discrepancy in treatment undoubtedly demonstrates that he is being singled out.
Conscious of the infamously abusive treatment of conditions in Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib prison, the international community is closely watching the treatment of political prisoners in the United States. The discrimination against Dr. Al-Arian and other political prisoners in the U.S. and their excessively harsh treatment will embolden dictatorships to do the same, and remain a dark spot in this country's human rights record.
--
To write to Dr. Al-Arian:
Dr. Sami Al-Arian (#40939-018)
FCI Tallahassee
Federal Correctional Institution
501 Capital Circle, NE
Tallahassee, FL 32301
--
ACTION ALERT:
To protest the abusive conditions against Dr. Al-Arian:
E-MAIL, CALL and WRITE Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
E-MAIL: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov
PHONE: 202-514-2001 and 202-353-1555
MAIL: U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Paul Perez, Chief Prosecutor. Emails can be sent to
steve.cole@usdoj.gov
Ask that it be forwarded to Paul Perez.
Amnesty International, Southern Office:
730 Peachtree Street NE
Suite 1060
Atlanta, GA 30308
phone: (404) 876-5661
fax: (404) 876-2276
1-866-A-REGION
aiusaso@aiusa.org
Permalink
| 17
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: law, sami al-arian, war on terror, Will
Monday, May 01, 2006
Judge Rejects Jury Verdict and Prosecution's Recommendation, Issues Maximum Sentence to al-Arian
From the Tampa Bay Coalition for Justice and Peace:
TAMPA— At a sentencing hearing this morning at the U.S. federal courthouse in Tampa, a judge issued Dr. Sami Al-Arian a maximum sentence of 57 months, despite recommendations by both government and defense attorneys to give him the low end of the sentence or 46 months.
Before the sentencing, Dr. Al-Arian's attorney, Linda Moreno, made a passionate appeal for the judge to order Dr. Al-Arian's immediate release and deportation on the basis of time-served: the 38 months he has been in prison, most of which were spent in solitary confinement under the most punitive conditions.
Dr. Al-Arian could have been released as early as May 23 under the low-end of the sentence. The maximum adds another 10 months.
Moreno also asked that the judge, James Moody, enter into the public record dozens of letters that were sent on behalf of Dr. Al-Arian from family members, students, colleagues and supporters worldwide, urging him to give Dr. Al-Arian the minimum sentence.
Among the letters she cited is one by a prominent Israeli academic, who wrote that Dr. Al-Arian is "genuinely committed to bring peaceand justice to his and my country."
In his eloquent address to the court, Dr. Al-Arian said: "This process affirmed my belief in the true meaning of a democratic society, in which the independence of the judiciary, the integrityof the jury system, and the system of checks and balances are upheld, despite intense political and public pressures."
Unfortunately, in his remarks before the sentencing, Judge Moody showed contempt for the jury process. None of his accusations, which were unequivocally rejected by the jury, appear anywhere in the actual plea agreement for which Dr. Al-Arian was being sentenced, or in the pre-sentencing report issued by a probation officer. He regurgitated long disproven accusations by the prosecution and even rehashed a charge by a previously discredited FBI informant. During the course of his tirade, Moody resorted to name-calling and personal insults. His vitriolic speech reflected an extreme bias against the Arab and Muslim community and a myopic view of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
On a day when all sides expected a swift and final resolution tothis painful chapter, the judge ensured Dr. Al-Arian's and hisfamily's continued suffering and sparked outrage by friends, colleagues and supporters. Following the vindictive display, many experienced lawyers and legal experts said they had never seen a judge carry himself in such an unscrupulous manner.
Furthermore, the draconian sentence by the judge caused asignificant setback in the civil rights struggle for Arab and Muslim Americans. It was also the latest contribution to the deepening rift between the U.S. and the Muslim world at a time when dialogue and understanding are needed.
One supporter on the courthouse steps said: "He truly represented the worst of America today."
Permalink
| 19
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: Fadi, law, sami al-arian
Sunday, April 30, 2006
Government Concedes, Al-Arian to be Released
Sami al-Arian's sentencing is take place on Monday. Al-Arian was arrested on February 20, 2003 with much hoopla; former Attorney General John Ashcroft at the time accused him of being the North American head of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Al-Arian was charged with 17 counts, mostly related to terrorism.
Al-Arian has languished in horrid imprisonment conditions for over three years now, the majority of this time in solitary confinement. The government meanwhile declared the indictment a landmark victory in the war on terrorism. On December 3, 2005, the government's false declarations caught up to them, as the jury at the Federal District Court in Tampa did not return a single guilty verdict. They acquitted him on the most serious charges, that he conspired to maim and murder people overseas, and were deadlocked 10-2 on 9 of the 17 counts. When repeatedly pressed to explain what evidentiary basis the two jurors had to find al-Arian guilty on the 9 counts, they were unable to provide any. In fact, since, one of the two unreasonable jurors admitted the lack of evidence to convict: "For me, the absence of evidence didn't mean there was no evidence. For me, it suggested a coverup..."
Another juror said, "An awful lot trees went into this evidence. But for what purpose, I don't know." In the words of juror 112, a 40-year old truck driver, "The evidence wasn't there to put a guilty verdict on it... People assume. They assume guilt...People really need to think about things before they make a decision. You really need to get the facts first. I sat in that room for six months. Until you've sat through something like this . . . you cannot sit in your car or at your house and determine guilt."
On April 17, it was announced that al-Arian and the government reached a plea agreement: in exchange for pleading guilty to one count, making or receiving services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the government would drop the remaining eight charges and expedite his deportation. In essence, this agreement confirms the complete lack of evidence against al-Arian. After wasting so much time (over a decade), money, and resources on trying to prove something that just wasn't there, the government opted to release him rather than waste any more time retrying (which would have been a fraction of that already spent).
From al-Arian's perspective, this does not affirm his innocence because this has already been established. Rather, it was the smart choice to make. Instead of prolonging a torturous confinement and isolation, al-Arian hastened his release by pleading to the count with the lowest sentencing time. If he opted to dismiss the government's desperate face-saving tactics, he would have been acquitted in maybe a year and deported, as he is not a citizen of the U.S. It was the obvious decision - freedom today rather than months, possibly years, from today. Not all see it this way though; Juror Ron states, "They have so little on him that I'm disappointed. Most of us think he gave in because he was so sick of being in jail."
And what is the cost to al-Arian? It is important to stress that al-Arian's pleading of guilt does not amount to a genuine admission of guilt. When at the plea agreement hearing, U.S. Magistrate Thomas B. McCoun said, "... if you're satisfied you're guilty or you believe it's in your best interest to plead guilty ... let me know that," al-Arian replied, "I believe it's in my best interest to enter a plea."
BREAKING UPDATE
U.S. District Judge James Moody has, in spite of the government recommendation of the minimum penalty and failure of the jury to reach a single guilty verdict, sentanced al-Arian to the maximum penalty of 57 months. This means al-Arian will be in prison for another 18 months before he is released.
Permalink
| 18
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: Fadi, law, sami al-arian, war of terror
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
AL-ARIAN ACQUITTED!
Sami Al-Arian was acquitted on the major counts against him today. The former professor at University of South Florida was charged with providing support to terrorists, namely the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. He was detained in early 2003, and imprisoned since then -- often in solitary confinement. Bill O'Reilly, Steven Emerson, Pipes, Senator Martinez, etc dragged his name through the mud. And now he is vindicated.
Throughout this process, I witnessed his family, who I saw as my own, their strength and their faith. Amazing. They kept moving forward, persistant and patient; and Dr. Al-Arian wrote poetry in prison:
Justice may be blind
But it's been hard to find
Because he's innocent
----
The Free Sami Al-Arian website kept us informed.
Permalink
| 2
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: law, sami al-arian, war of terror, Will
Sunday, July 17, 2005
Week 5 of the Al Arian Trial
Sent from tampabaycoalitionforjusticeandpeace@yahoogroups.com
July 17, 2005
Pancakes, not Brigades: Week 5 in Dr. Al-Arian's Trial
TAMPA-
Last Thursday, observers at Dr. Sami Al-Arian's trial in Tampa were shocked when a government translator admitted under cross examination that he wrongly translated an Arabic word that means "pancakes" to "brigades" in a conversation between two defendants in the case (more details below). To many, this incident sums up the case against Dr. Al-Arian and his co-defendants.
Following a week's break for the Fourth of July holiday, testimony resumed in the closely watched trial. Week five of the trial featured the government's introduction of evidence acquired as a result of years of secret wiretaps on Dr. Al-Arian and several others. In the months leading up to the trial, defense attorneys challenged the legality of the FISA wiretap intercepts, which had never been considered admissible in any criminal trial. Judge James Moody denied those motions, however, and by the start of the trial, the government was set to introduce these conversations as evidence.
On Monday, FBI Special Agent Mike Alfeiri testified about the process of obtaining FISA warrants, which allow the monitoring of telephones, fax machines, and computers for "intelligence gathering" purposes. Alfeiri acknowledged that at least several dozen telephone numbers were monitored beginning in 1994 through early 2003. As Dr.
Al-Arian's defense attorney William Moffitt alluded to during opening statements, the government collected over 21,000 hours of recorded telephone calls, comprising about 472,000 separate conversations during the nine-year period. Of that number, fewer than 400 calls are expected to be introduced by the government.
Through government translator Tahsin Ali, prosecutors introduced approximately 70 transcripts of the FISA intercepts they plan to use in their case. Defense attorney Linda Moreno pointed out to jurors that many of the conversations attributed to Dr. Al-Arian have been redacted by the government, that is, edited to include only selected content. In some instances, over a hundred lines of conversation were
removed between one portion of the conversation and the next. It also appeared that statements by certain speakers were at times cut off mid-sentence, which defense attorneys argue could have drastically changed the content of the conversation.
Ali also translated videotapes seized in government searches of Dr. Al-Arian's home in 1995. Portions of two of those tapes, both pro-Palestinian events dating back to 1991, were played for the jury during the week. Prosecutors seized on selected quotations from the heavily redacted tapes in an attempt to inflame the passions of the jury and outside observers sensitive to some of the religious references and emotional appeals made by the speakers at the time of the largely non-violent first Palestinian Intifada. The lack of historical context, knowledge of Islam, and the heavy editing that occurred with respect to the tapes was a clear attempt by the
government to distort the message of the speakers and mislead jurors.
Several of the quotations selected by the government were in actuality verses from the Koran with a particular religious and historical significance. The government's translator refused to even acknowledge that they were religious quotes until confronted by a copy of the Koran which contained the verses in question. In some instances, defense attorneys demonstrated that Ali's translation differed from
that of most accepted translations of the Koran, often by trying to convey a more hostile message. Moreno also questioned Ali about the various meanings of the word "jihad," which he acknowledged is not the literal translation of "holy war" as is often depicted. In one particularly notable display, Federal Public Defender Kevin Beck revealed that the Arabic word translated by Ali to mean "brigades," in
one of defendant Hatim Fariz's conversations, actually meant "pancakes." Ali admitted that he had misunderstood the term and many observers were awestruck by the disparity between the government's intended meaning and the actual word.
Also last week, FBI Agent Sally Hayes testified about charts and indexes she prepared for the government's case which compiled information obtained as a result of the searches, subpoenas, and years of surveillance. Among the many charts was one travel index which displayed twelve trips taken by various individuals over a ten year period out of an estimated 700 trips acknowledged by Hayes. It was
not immediately clear what significance that trips held to the government, but under cross-examination, Hayes admitted to attorney William Moffitt that actual tickets were not among the government's evidence, and thus it could not be proven if these trips actually took place. Similarly, Sameeh Hammoudeh's attorney Steven Bernstein
demonstrated a discrepancy between the government's evidence and his client's travel and accommodations.
In addition, last week marked the transition of a new team of United States Marshals to Judge Moody's court. As noted by the St. Petersburg Times, the new U.S. Marshals made an increased presence in the courtroom, first by including several agents near the defense tables, and secondly by placing new restrictions on the family and
friends of Dr. Al-Arian, Hammoudeh, Fariz, and Ghassan Ballout. On more than one occasion, Dr. Al-Arian's family was stopped for attempting to deliver legal materials to attorneys. As reported by the Times, Moffitt protested to the Marshals, "I've never been in a courtroom where family members can't give papers to lawyers."
Marshals insisted on searching the folders and boxes of exhibits. Moffitt responded, "All I'm asking is to bring in a few documents. If you want to rummage through the box, go ahead." No official explanation was given for the extraordinary measures, though one agent stated that it was a result of "contraband" materials passed to Sameeh Hammoudeh by his family several weeks ago. The nature of the
contraband? A Father's Day card signed by his daughters.
The trial will resume at 9AM tomorrow, Monday July 18, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in downtown Tampa.
A rally in support of Dr. Al-Arian will take place at Noon outside of the Sam M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse, 801 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33602.
--
To view articles on the trial published in the St. Petersburg Times, please visit their special coverage page.
Permalink
| 0
comments
| Links to this post
|
KABOBegories: law, sami al-arian, war of terror, Will








