Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts

Monday, March 24, 2008

Sex Education Saudi Style

I have to thank Angry Arab for bringing me to light about this fatwa originally, but i couldn't help re-posting it. Since it is in Arabic, I will summarize: a website that specializes in fatwas on "women's issues" called Eve's World posts the following (Arabic only): if a man has anal sex with his wife without realizing it, he is forgiven as long as he ceases as soon as his wife informs him. There is a long-winded explanation given for this using chain of narratives which ends up saying that God "told the Jews" that having anal sex or sex with your wife while "she is laid on her face" will produce a cross-eyed child. However, fear not, for God did not reveal the full truth to the Jews, as anal sex does not (gasp!) result in pregnancy! This stellar sex education tip is accompanied by the ruling that a husband may "take his wife however he pleases, laying on her back or on her face, so long as his entry is in 'the front' and not 'the rear'". I find this disturbing enough to share not just because of the insertion (no pun intended) of Jews into this whole tale so as to try and somehow link them to sexual deviance - taking advantage of their being mentioned a whole lot in Surat al-Baqarah (the Cow Chapter of the Qur'an) - but also because implicitly the fatwa seems to say that (heterosexual) butt sex is ok if the husband "doesn't know" and the wife doesn't inform him! Can this also mean that a man can have sex with another (male-bodied) man as long as he thinks the latter is female and is not informed to the contrary? In addition to this, the fatwa is inadvertently reassuring curious young people who may lack safer sex knowledge that anal sex will not get you pregnant. Oh, if only they had found a Hadith that supported using condoms.

PS: In addition, I would like to thank his Beneficience the Sheikh who issued this fatwa for teaching me the term for anal sex in good fussha (classical Arabic). This will definitely be worked into my next homework composition.

Digg this

Read More...

Friday, March 21, 2008

Religion and Politics

It's not surprising that the intersection of religion and politics may occassionally beget controversy. Really, though, have we ever seen anything that nears the pandamonium surrounding Obama's family minister and spiritual advisor, Jeremiah Wright? I genuinely wonder if this is at least partially a product of White people wanting to feel indignant at the Black man. I mean, it's not like he's the first to use fiery rhetoric to convey ideas that can be considered offensive or inflammatory to some sector of society. Presidential spiritual advisors - past and present - openly preach anticipation for America's destruction (i.e., the rapture), the threat of Jews, the evil of homosexuality, and a desire to eradicate the Muslims. McCain's spiritual guide refers to Allah as a "demon spirit" and calls on Christians to wage a war against Muslims. A Bush advisor blames the Church for 9/11 and calls on Christians to pray for bin Laden. Hardly a whisper is ever heard about these pontifications. Undoubtedly there is a double standard being applied, and I think it may be beneficial to investigate the reasons.

On a sidenote, I was reading this Washington Post blog on faith, where the Author enters Jesse Jackson (an advisor to the Clintons during that Presidency) into the equation: "The Clintons did not repudiate Jackson... for accepting Arab money for two of his organizations." For those of you who (inexplicably) do not see what's wrong with this statement, imagine if she had said "Black money" or "Jewish money." Just another example of how anti-Arab racism has become a form of acceptable discourse in this country.

Digg this

Read More...

Friday, February 08, 2008

Turkey Almost Votes for Religious Freedom!

According to the print issue of the International Herald Tribune on Feb 8,

Lawmakers voted early Thursday to approve a constitutional amendment to allow women to enter universities wearing Islamic head scarves, a move that many secular Turks view as an attempt to impose religion on their daily lives.

Lawmakers voted 401 to 110 in a preliminary vote in favor of the government's proposed amendment to the Constitution. The government has defended its plan as a reform needed to give its citizens religious liberty and bring Turkey in line with European Union human rights guidelines.

A second, final round of voting was scheduled for Saturday. (AP)
Well, I should think so!! Forcing women to choose between their religious beliefs and their education is completely and utterly unacceptable, first off. As it stands in Turkey, you can't study at university, or teach for that matter, if you are a religious Muslim woman who wears the headscarf. You either have to violate your religious beliefs, give up your educational career altogether in anything outside Islamic Law, or opt for a third choice: learning an entirely new language in order to study in another country.

I studied Arabic with a young Turkish woman in Jordan, who was studying to master the Arabic language in order to obtain a bachelor's level degree from the University of Jordan in Psychology. The route to higher education in her own country was closed to her, as she chose to wear hijab.

I view any policy that excludes women for wearing hijab as just as offensive and unacceptable as a policy that excludes women who do not. But fundamental personal religious freedoms aside, it can't possibly be in Turkey's best interest as a nation to encourage bright and ideological young people to leave and put down roots elsewhere for the sake of their education.

Aha! Here's a BBC article on the same topic.

According to it, two-thirds of women in Turkey cover their hair... that's a lot of people not allowed to attend college classes.

The government's plan to change the law has sparked large protest rallies by secular Turks, who want to defend the legacy of the modern state's founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

They fear it may be a first step to eroding the secular system.

Yes! It's a slippery slippery slope, my friends. A SLIPPERY SLOPE! First your religious neighbor's daughter will attend classes with yours, and then there will be NO ALCOHOL SOLD ANYWHERE IN THE COUNTRY!!!!!! ANYWHERE!!!!!

Digg this

Read More...

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Bethlehem: The Realest Christians You're Likely to Meet

I hate to be railroaded by the very few individuals who post ignorant comments on this blog, but I feel like posting this particular link. It describes quite well interesting aspects of the historic relationship of Christians and Muslims to the area that is Bethlehem today, and the relationship of the groups to each other.

While I personally have experienced instances of ignorant comments made by Palestinian Christians about Palestinian Muslims and vice versa, my personal observation is that for the most part, feelings of enmity between the communities are dwarfed by the shared hardships faced under occupation. I highly recommend visiting Bethlehem if you are able (if you aren't Arab, and Israel will let you in, first off), to experience the place and draw your own conclusions.

The land of Palestine is inhabited by a majority of Moslems who, like the Christians and the Jews, venerate many of the patriarchs and prophets of the Old Testament, and who also feel a special relationship with Bethlehem as the birthplace of the Prophet Jesus (or 'Isa in Arabic). Of all the Christian saints, Moslems venerate especially Mary, the mother of Jesus, to whom a full sura (chapter 19) in the Koran is dedicated. Moreover, since the beginnings of Islam, Bethlehem was included in the Moslem pilgrimage route that followed the road from Jerusalem, with its Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque, to Hebron, with the tombs of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and their wives Sarah, Rebecca and Leah.

The Moslem-Christian living together in Palestine indeed goes back to the beginnings of Islam. Even though there have been periods of proselytizing and, at tragic moments of history, cases of oppression and discrimination, the general picture is one of a Moslem-Christian living together in daily peace, respect and cooperation. It is common to hear Palestinians saying that it does not matter whether one is Moslem or Christian; both believe in the same God, speak the same language and share the same Arabic culture.

Digg this

Read More...

Monday, December 31, 2007

The guy with the gun wants to know...

“What religion are you?” The Israeli guard at Hebron's Tomb of the Patriarchs wanted to know.

In Israel and Occupied Palestine, answering this question correctly can make a world of difference as a tourist. And at the current moment, it meant either entering or not entering the cave where father Abraham, his many sons AND Adam and Eve are allegedly buried.

Yes, that Adam and that Eve.

Okay, so by now I've decided to save time by no longer pondering too much on how people could possibly even know that's actually them in there. This, I think, actually strays from the point. It's more like the idea of them being in there that makes it true.

Speaking of ideas, being in the Holy Land is making me recall (badly) all those stories and maps I had once read somewhere and so genuinely believed. I've kinda become curious to see, in person, what the hype has all been about. But first, I need to get rid of this guard. Do I tell the man with the gun that the answer is that I was raised Christian, but leave out that all sense of religion was lost over the course of a semester after learning the fate of Galileo Galilei in my astronomy class?

Or do I tell him that he might actually like my father, a Guatemalan-evangelical-preacher, who wants to see the Jews build the third temple more badly and quickly than even they want to build it -- but leave out the part about how he’d like to see them all killed afterward?

Or I could play the Jew card instead, explaining that we just learned that my mother’s last name is Sephardic so Mazel Tov, I'm kinda Jewish(?) -- but leave out out the part about how now that I'm a Jew, will my voice matter in this state of affairs, as the Israeli state is commiting atrocities in my name and where do I file a complaint?

I toyed with this last one until I recalled the conversation my friend Clayton and I had while crossing the border with our Syria/Lebanon passport stamps as la migra held us up for 8 hours and made it their business, among other things, to find out our paternal names.

“Damn, why don’t they ask me about my maternal side instead?" I whispered to Clayton. "My mom's supposedly kinda Jewish-ish.”

“Well,” he reminded me, “you take your chances seeing that you’re not Ashkenazi.”

It’s true. I recently read somewhere that in Israel, being a brown kinda Jew means being a wrong kinda Jew. This has been confirmed by an Israeli friend of mine who admitted that without the shared hatred of the Palestinians harmoniously bringing the nation together, Israel would have to deal with its own very serious internal problems instead.

So what was I to answer to this security guard? Do I kinda lie or tell the truth? There's a fine line between the two. I don’t really believe in God. But then, I don’t really believe that I don’t believe in God. I can’t say I’m an Atheist because to have to constantly prove that there is no God is really just another form of fundamentalism, and as a friend of mine points out, “Is too much work.”

“No religion,” I replied.

“That the best kind,” he smiles.

Whoa. I glanced up at the heavens expecting to find a P.O.ed baby Jesus, and couldn't help wondering if we were about to be turned into a whale or swallowed by a pillar of salt.

“Where are you from?” he asked.

“Los Angeles.”

“Go ahead inside,” he winked, and led me to the Jewish section of the Tomb.

“But I’m not Jewish.”

“That’s okay,” he said. “You’re special.”

I figured if a guy with the gun says it, it must be true to somebody. I reached a metal detector where I was asked to show the contents of my bag. Seven seconds later, a soldier gasped. “A keffiyeh!” he exclaimed, piquing the interest of his soldier friends. I couldn’t tell if they were horrified because they thought the scarf would slither out and snap at them like a serpent, or if they’d never been confronted with a situation where anyone seeking to visit the Jewish section of the Tomb could even own such a garment. They briefly congregated away from me and one of them returned, letting me know that I was allowed to enter but needed to hide the scarf in my purse and not let anyone inside see it. I agreed, recalling the story of that Israeli settler who shot and killed 29 Muslims praying in the very Tomb I was about to enter. I nodded to the guard, and pulled my left sleeve down to cover the Palestine bracelet a store-owner in the Old Souq had given to me only minutes before.

I entered the Tomb and witnessed several Jewish men and women praying in segregated, gendered areas. I realized that this is the first time I had seen Jewish civilians on this trip. Many children were there, speaking English with American accents while holding their parents’ hands. They laughed, smiled, and walked throughout in sheer awe. They are people. The brutal occupation is comprised of people. The ethnic cleansing exists on behalf of, and through the might and complicity of, a group of... people. Just people. It's perhaps, when there is no gun to your face, that these sentiments become much more easily realized. (Also more easily realized: many might want to concentrate on their own religion’s “gender issues” before launching into attacks of others.)

So right then, like back home when speaking to some of my progressive Jewish friends who I can no longer have a conversation about Israel because whenever their unconditional support for it shines through it breaks my heart into a million little pieces, I was reminded of the late Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt, who described evil as “banal”. In her 1968 book “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil” Arendt sought to highlight that often, those who carry out unspeakable crimes are ordinary individuals who rationalize these acts in very unremarkable ways. Such people are not always crazy lunatics but rather, those who simply accept that which is routine and normative. Never problematic. Never immoral. And like Eichmann, they'd probably say they're just doing their jobs.

We’ve become, I think, so good at vilifying certain people who commit atrocities into ways that reduce them down to the status of animals or fanatics. This is not useful and is actually proving to be quite harmful. To think that evil can only come from those who are not like us takes us on a dangerous trajectory where it becomes impossible to accept that we and our loved ones are also quite capable of harming others, no matter how well-intentioned we may be. We can say this about the general Israeli population on Palestine, and we can say this about the general American population on Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Latin America, Africa... ad nauseum. Our complacency renders us complicit.

I walked to the back of the Tomb and was greeted by a soldier guarding the door separating the Jewish and Muslim sections. He assured me that he was there for my protection as I didn’t want to be accidentally wandering into that dangerous place.

“Really?” My eyes widened incredulously, trying to peek in. “What will happen to me?”

His face fell into grave seriousness, “They steal.”

I flashed a quick smile and waved good bye, hurriedly making my way out. "They steal?!" I muttered under my breath. I walked away wondering how this soldier, who seemed genuinely nice (minus the automatic weapon), came to “know” what he knew. Knowledge has serious consequences in real peoples' lives. Perhaps in my personal interest to save time by not allowing myself to ponder too much on how people could possibly even know what they "know", I might also be chosing to ignore those things about us which, in reality, are proving to be quite harmful.

Digg this

Read More...

Sunday, December 23, 2007

2007 Haj Factoids and Eid Mubarak!

Cause I know how much Americans revere factoids-why else would sports stats and game shows like Jeopardy and Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader be so popular if not?

The Haj Round-up:

  • 2,454,325 pilgrims from 181 nations, 1,707,814 outside of Saudia Arabia, performed the Hajj this year.
  • This is the first Haj on record with no fatalities. And, according to Interior Minister Prince Naif, no single accident. My father says it's because my brother was there to bless the scene.
  • Ahmedinajed was the first President of the Islamic Republic of Iran to perform the Haj. He was invited by King of Abdullah to attend.
  • "Pick up your Zem Zem, tall extra hot double shot skim gingerbread latte, and $1000 quilted bag all in one trip." There is a Starbucks and a Chanel in the vicinity of the "sanctuary of the Kaba"! For some reason, I have heard no talk of this from media outlets. Wonder why...
Once again-HAJJ is spotlighted, while Eid remains in it's shadow-with little to no coverage of Ramadan and Hajj's stepsister, I dedicate the rest of this post, in true TRL style, to shouting out EID!

HAPPY EID AL-ADHA!

Kil 3mtoo bekhair!

Slay a lamb for me!

Digg this

Read More...

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Addressing Religious Sectarian Divide in Lebanon

You know I love me some PSAs-especially Ay-rab ones!

An ad sponsored by Lebanon-based Byblos Banks asks:

"When will we become Lebanese?"



I'll have to admit, the ad has got some Easy Cheese-iness to it, but the Omani man in it definitely doesn't!!!

Another plus for the PSA, besides addressing religious sectarian, the casting of tayyib man, is the overrepresentation of Arabs in this Benetton-inspired ad.

Digg this

Read More...

Thursday, December 13, 2007

If You Are Part of the 1.5 Million Strong...

And you are reading this right now, you are obligated to pick me up some Zam zam water!

Look for a Fayyad Fatwa, official unofficially binding decree, to follow shortly.

More than 1.5 million join pilgrimage to Mecca

MECCA, Saudi Arabia (AFP) - By Wednesday, 1,467,515 people from around the world had arrived in the desert kingdom, the official SPA news agency quoted the hajj central commission as saying.

Nearly 2.4 million people flocked to Saudi Arabia to perform the last hajj, including more than 1.6 million from outside the kingdom.

The annual pilgrimage, which also attracts hundreds of thousands of Saudi faithful as well as foreigners resident in the kingdom, begins on Monday, the eighth day of the month of Dhi al-Hajja under the lunar calendar.

Saudi Arabia has announced that the high point of the hajj, when pilgrims converge on Mount Arafat near Mecca, would take place on Tuesday, and that Eid al-Adha, the Muslim Feast of the Sacrifice marking the end of the pilgrimage, would be celebrated the next day.

Muslims slaughter sacrificial lambs to mark the feast of Eid al-Adha.

All Muslims are required to make the hajj to Mecca, in western Saudi Arabia, at least once in their lifetime if they have the means to do so.

Digg this

Read More...

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

I really didn't mean to ramble on

Recently I have been enjoying Amartya Sen's Identity and Violence, which eloquently argues against simplistic identity formations:

“Indeed, the world is increasingly seen, if only implicitly, as a federation of religions or civilizations, thereby ignoring all the other ways in which people see themselves. Underlying this line of thinking is the odd presumption that the people of the world can be uniquely categorized according to some singular and overarching system of partitioning.”
When we are involved with this kind of discourse we do damage not just to those we push away, but to ourselves. Fortunately, the reactionary pundits and politicians (the world over) who are proponents of this world view are not the only ones out there. Kabobfest has profiled many of those whose very existence refutes the overly simple world view, that Sen critiques so well, from poetry to rap to rock.

Personally, I am not a big of Led Zeppelin, but with the group's reunion tour upon us, Mark Levine and Salman Ahmed (both worth checking out for their respective works) offer an interesting take on the historic band, both for them personally and for music in general:

Led Zeppelin's self-described "tight but loose" musical philosophy had a special impact on us. In blues, rock, and jazz, the drummer and bassist's function is primarily to lay down a tight groove over which the front men can let loose. Rarely does the rhythm section have the space to take the music to a higher dimension.

But Zeppelin bassist John Paul Jones and drummer John Bonham did just that. The interplay between all four musicians linked Zeppelin to the great chain of Sufi-inspired improvisers, from the Gnawa slaves of the Maghreb, across North Africa and the Middle East still to the Qawwali of North India.

It was this pedigree
that separated Led Zeppelin from the rest of the rock 'n roll universe, reminding those with the right ears of a time when the distinctions between East and West, Islam and Europe, were still fuzzy--often productively so. It's no wonder the band was signed by a Turkish music impresario, Ahmet Ertegun, in whose honor they are reuniting once more.

For some other thought provoking examples to think about:


* No matter what the Iranian government declares "obscene" (although I agree that 50 cent is at least lame, if not obscene) people will push open the cracks and when given the chance, raise their voices.


* We should remember that artists, the world over, are often taking a great risk by doing what they do. A great example is the fate of the Iraqi rock group, Acrassicauda, which is also a great case study for the plight of moderates in Iraq and their fates as refugees.


It is important to remember that although the arts are often some of the clearest ways to deconstruct the "us" vs. "them" mentality, there is ample evidence against this thesis in the way we live our daily lives.


Now let's be clear, I don't mean to say religion is unimportant. Christians and Yazidis sadly continue to be targeted in Iraq. It is this kind of senseless persecution that is leading to changes in the Arab Christian community as well (I always think about Jesus when I see BMX bikes). It is my fear that these kinds of changes will only lead to more rifts in the region, which is probably the least productive option. I keep hearing about "new" media savvy Muslim preachers, but I am still waiting to see how this movement shakes out before I get too excited.


It is a sad statement that, even not including the Palestinians, the Arab world is home to more than its share of stateless persons, even when the leaders of those stateless groups say really stupid things. Yet another sign that whether the constructed difference is based on religion, race or ideology, it is usually innocents who suffer the most.

Digg this

Read More...

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Romney: "I want a lame-ass cabinet!"

Okay, the actual quote:

"…based on the numbers of American Muslims [as a percentage] in our population, I cannot see that a cabinet position would be justified. But of course, I would imagine that Muslims could serve at lower levels of my administration."*
Well, there goes my shot! I guess he feels cabinet level positions should be filled by quotas and not by merit. I wonder if his fellow Republicans know he likes quotas so much...

IF (big if there) this is his actual belief (i.e. population, not merit) and not a smoke-screen for discriminating against Muslims, doesn't this have some serious implications? If the Muslim .6% of the population (a 2001 figure that is probably higher now) is not high enough, then who else is out? Well, the Orthodox Christians at .3% have no shot (in your face Stephanopoulos!). Forget any Hindu (.3%) or Buddhist (.2%) in a Romney cabinet. At a measly .3% the religion of multiple former US presidents and freakin' Superman does not stand a ghost of a chance.

Who knows where the ceiling for getting into the club is? Heck, if by Romney's logic .6% ain't enough to get you in the cabinet, is 1.4% really enough to be president?

*In all fairness there is a small chance that Romney meant he would only not appoint a Muslim for cabinet level positions on security matters. If so, I guess that is marginally less bad.

Digg this

Read More...

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

God Apparently Is Just A "Prick"

Northern Georgia, Last week (KFN)- Georgians seemed irate Tuesday after what they regarded an “un-cool prank” from God. “This s a pretty serious situation here, and humor is no appreciated, we need a serious response,” said farmer John Corcher in response to the trickle or rain that fell on Georgia a day after a multi-faith rain prayer organized by governor Sonny Purdue took place at the steps of the state capitol.

“We know the Lord has sense of humor, but this is a serious situation,” said governor Perdue while on a trade trip to Montréal. “We timed this prayer with a rainstorm that has been forecast for more than a week to avoid this embarrassing situation. It’s like he’s telling us ‘I got your rain right here,’ now he’s just being, dare I say, a prick” Added the governor as he cupped his crotch with his right hand.

God has a sense of humor alright, not only did she tease drought-stricken Georgia with insufficiently few drops of rain, she also drenched the Carolina’s with torrential raining, once again siding with Big Tobacco. Other states like Tennessee and Kentucky got more than they needed as well. A week has passed and no more rain had fallen, an indication that god is not looking favorebly on Georgia, and that the "tease" was meant to be more than a joke.

“A joke? May be, but not a prank” objected Hassan Omreyeh, a farmer from Southern Lebanon, "when god pulls a prank, you’ll know it, he just teased them with a little rain, it's not like he plagued them with exploding rain.” He added in reference to this week’s cluster-bomb storm that hit the densely populated south.

Ironically, not only does rain prayer seem laughable to atheists, but sadly, rain prayers seem so to followers of other faiths. In Islam, believers take out to the fields, in droves, with their livestock, turn their cloths inside out for dramatic effect to demonstrate to god more misery than she actually had inflicted on the inhabitants of the drought-stricken land as they perform the rain prayer known as Salat Alistisqa’. However, to those people, Native American rain dances seemed nothing more than comic relief.

Similarly, Christianity’s history is no short on example of condescension towards social and spiritual practices of other cultures, but it’s not like it expanded on missions that asked or forced indigenous populations to give up their “savage” native practices because it’s wrong and the bible is right, that would have been awful.

But hey, there are times when one would rather pray with a Muslim over compromising with an atheist, especially if it helps them bring religion back into the government.

Happy Thanksgiving

Digg this

Read More...

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Giuliani Wins “Islamic Terrorism-Bee"

The much coveted Christian Coalition Nominee of the year award was announced yesterday, reports KABOBfest’s senior religious affair correspondent, Chaim Sugerman

This year’s award was presented to republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani by Christian Coalition founder Pat “Iron” Robertson at a black-tie ceremony in Virginia Beach, VA.

In a time of "deadly peril" Mr Giuliani was the best-equipped to maintain "the defence of our population from the blood lust of Islamic terrorists". Said Robertson while playing down Giuliani’s incompatibility with the interests of the religious right.

“The fact that he takes an opposing stand to us on all of the moral issues should not distract from his unwavering crusade against Muslim, I mean, Muslim terrorists, this is no time to concentrate on his pro-gay, pro-abortion, anti-gun agenda; we have a more dangerous enemy now.” Added the host of the 700 Club, who was shunned by god earlier this year.

The Coalition’s Presidential nomination endorsement prize is awarded once every four years to the viable republican candidate who uses the phrase “Islamic Terrorism” the most times during their campaign speeches.

A spokesman for Mr. Robertson said that this year in particular the decision was hard. “Several candidate are well-worthy of the endorsement, yet, they did not use the phrase as frequently are as early in the campaign as desired.” Said the spokesman in a clear reference to candidates John McCain of Arizona, and Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas Governor.

McCain scored high during the selection process for his refusal to consider facts about Iran’s nuclear program and his relentless advocacy to use overwhelming, uncalculated force against it. However, he was docked points by the selection committee for refusing to endorse torture, and for not using the “Islamic Terrorism” phrase often enough.

Mike Huckabee was also seen to have great conservative credentials, but was criticized for beginning to use the phrase very late in the campaign.

Surprisingly disqualified was former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. “His usage frequency of the phrase came very close to that of Mr. Giuliani,” said the spokesman, “but it was clear to us that Romney's was an effort to disguise from the fact that he belongs to an evil faith himself.”

Variations of the phrase also count towards the award, among those are “Islamic Extremism,” “Islamo-fascism” and “Islamic Radicalism.”

In first reaction to the award announcement from Wall Street, The Dow Jones plunged 360 points in one day.

In other news, the stock price of Sam Adams’ maker, Boston Beer Company Inc. dropped by 25% yesterday on news that Nadeem has been admitted to rehab.

Digg this

Read More...

Monday, October 29, 2007

Planting Little Wahhabis All Over The World, Like Really Little Ones

This could sound like a plot to take over the world and turn it into an Islamic empire, each country from within, except the slimy Saudi men who have their entire central nervous system concentrated in the tip of their penises and rent prostitutes abroad over the summer and try, somehow, to make it seem legitimate by documenting their adultery with a “marriage contract,” are nowhere near thinking about other than sex, let alone having long term plans for world domination.

JEDDAH — The summer season is known as a primetime for male Saudi tourists to marry women from other countries while on holiday abroad. These marriages are generally unplanned. Most men undergo such marriages with an intention of enjoying their vacation in the companyof women who are "religiously" legal for them.

The marriages are ones of convenience. While men look for fun, the women are usually experiencing financial difficulties and see summer marriages as a way to be spoilt and have money spent on them. The real victims of such marriages are their children.

Read more about the Children of Summer

Ironically, such temporary marriage contracts, some of which known as Mut’a or Misyar, are most common among women in need, and men who are too pious to have sex simply out of wedlock. As if screwing a women all summer, taking advantage of her poverty, or the dearth of her husband, after which she becomes an undesired candidate for a meaningful relationship, or a broke college student backpacking through Europe, who was planning to have sex in most cities she goes to any way but does not mind somebody paying for her meals and stay in the mean time, impregnating her, and leaving her with the child are less of a sin than just having consensual sex.

While the above concepts are generally new to Islamic law, at least in their current form, and find acceptance among some religious figures, they are diametrically at odds with the Islamic vision of marriage, which intends longevity, faithful commitment, and the building of a family structure that strengthens the society as a whole. So one needs not to read an explicit text in the Quran stating so to realize such actions are Haram, to put in a language those holier-than-thou’s understand, despite the loud objections we are about to hear from Will.

Any person who is religious enough to chose such a route over out of wedlock sex likely knows enough about Islam to recognize the illegitimacy of those marriages, but they manipulate the religion rules of which they claim to be the guardians to suit their wishes, just like the Israeli Rabbis who manipulate the same law of Shmita they enforce, but who can blame them, every body knows there is no finer delicacy than a check-point aged tomato.

Such actions are often sanctioned by religious figures of higher authority, albeit a minority; you only need the opinion of one if you are only looking for an excuse. Should you have doubt about the public being well informed on the legitimacy of their actions, the Imams and Muftis definitely do. Those leaders, however, sanction popular wrong-doings in order to buy allegiances and assert authority. Kind of like the sale of the indulgences by the Catholic Church.

But who could blame them, I’m lacking as an entrepreneur, but the moment I find a new way to get you to fill the world with debauchery, while I collect financial and political royalties on it, I’ll be enlisting all of you, bitches.

Digg this

Read More...

Monday, October 15, 2007

Coulter Picks Fight With Wrong Religion

Hatemonger and crackhead-impersonator Ann Coulter appeared on CNBC's The Big Idea, hosted by Donny Deutsch, and proceeded to posit that Christians were perfect and everyone else should become perfect.

When asked what she thought America should look like, she said, "It would look like New York City during the [2004] Republican National Convention. In fact, that's what I think heaven is going to look like." Coulter expounded, "People were happy. They're Christian. They're tolerant. They defend America."

(By the way, check out a report of that convention from the Strip Club's view, hardly Coulter's Christian vision.)

Did, she say "tolerant"? That's like Abe Foxman claiming to value open debate.

Donny Deutsch, playing the role of a good Jew, challenged her. He wanted to know what would happen to the Jews in Coulter's utopia (the Muslims, he could care less about, of course sice only self-hating Jews really care about others)? She said Jews needed to convert to Christianity in order to be "perfected." Christians, she said, have a "fast track" to God.

Deutsch wasn't too pleased with her non-Muslim-bashing. He responded, "So we should be Christian? It would be better if we were all Christian?" Coulter said yes, and like a good Christian, invited Deutsch to attend church with her.

DEUTSCH: We should just throw Judaism away and we should all be Christians, then?

COULTER: Yeah.

DEUTSCH: Really?

COULTER: Well, it's a lot easier. It's kind of a fast track.

Deutsch then tried to hit her where it really hurts. He compared Coulter's position and a position commonly, but inaccurately ascribed, to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

DEUTSCH: "Let's wipe Israel off the earth." I mean, what, no Jews?

COULTER: No, we think - we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say.

DEUTSCH: Wow, you didn't really say that, did you?

COULTER: Yes. That is what Christianity is. We believe the Old Testament, but ours is more like Federal Express. You have to obey laws.

According to a columnist at Ha'aretz:

A commercial break ensued, during which Coulter asked Deutsch for a chance to explain the comment about "perfecting" Jews. She adamantly turned aside all suggestions that the comment could be offensive to Jews, that it could be construed as hateful or anti-Semitic. "I don't think you should take it that way," she said. "But that is what Christians consider themselves: perfected Jews."
Welcome to the logic of mainstream, white supremacy.

The Ha'aretz columnist, though he paid lip service to her Muslim-bashing, is now quite alarmed by her. Anti-Islam is quite acceptable and okay, but Jew-hating is the biggest sin. The responses from American newspapers, and many on the right, demonstrate this to a tee. Where were they when she directed hate speech towards gays and Muslims?

Most interestingly, this brush-up indicates the potential for certain cracks within the Zionist-Christian nut alliance -- the heart of Israel's support. Coulter is messing with some big political forces. She is just a pundit, not an organizer and no one of particular political weight. So this probably won't impact her. But many more will see her as a looney tunes character better off ignored.

Equally troubling is Deutsch's rush to concern for Israel. Israel, which certainly treats Jews as superior to Arab Muslims and Christians, relies on the same ethno-religious chauvinism that drives Coulter's disgusting views. Deutsch makes the same mistake Zionists do. In their chauvinistic schemas, challenging Israel's status as a Jewish state means commiting genocide. Deutsch fails to consider the possibility of a secular, non-biased state, which is an alternative he can only conceive of as "wiping off the map." Israel's government must be de-Judaized (not the people of course) if one values the principles of equality and fairness. Neither Coulter nor Deutsch does.

By the way, for prior KABOBfest mentions of Coulter.

Digg this

Read More...

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Happy Eid al-Fitr!

(Eid Mubarak)

  • As part of the holiday spirit, word has it that Obama Barack will be sending out yet another email proclaiming his Islamic devotion. [Politico]. Btw, I like how exposing or portraying someone as Muslim in America is considered a smear campaign!
  • Okay, perhaps a more genuine proclamation of Muslim support-New York will be lighting the Empire State building green in honor of the Islamic holiday that celebrates the end of Ramadan (literally translated, Eid al-Fitr means, celebration of the break!). [AFP]. Incidentally, the green illlumination coincides with the upcoming release of "The Incredible Hulk." Coincidence? I think not! Sublimial corporate tie-in masquerading as a altruistic act of religious toleration? I think yes...[IMDb]

Digg this

Read More...

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Jesus Hates Zionists

For real, dawg. Unfortunately, some Christians are slow to recognize that. But it’s never too late; a Dutch Church is reconsidering its policy of “Solidarity with Israel.”

After 37 years of boasting of "inalienable solidarity" with the people of Israel, the Netherlands' second largest church plans to reexamine its stance this fall. A group of notables from the Protestant Church in the Netherlands (PCN) warned last week that the organization, which has over 2 million members, is in danger of being "hijacked" by pro-Palestinian activists.

The warning - coauthored by Dr. Jan van der Graaf, who served for 35 years as PCN's general secretary, and three other prominent church figures - was an open letter against changing the reference to Israel. It was addressed to Minister Henri Veldhuis, a General Synod member who said the clause made the church adopt a biased view that ignored Israeli actions against Palestinians.

Of course the Dutch are no leading voice on Christianity, nor are they an authority on theology, but they have a solid track record of democracy, human rights (officially and post-colonialism that is) and progressive values, evident by the omnipresent smoke blanket over the country.

This is the latest development in the march towards Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel. A devil’s-advocate, wishful-thinking type, yet critical review of the BDS movement came out in last week's Economist.

While the Economist correctly illuminates the strength of Israel’s advocates and lobbyists in comparison to Apartheid South Africa's, it fails to recount much of the support the BDS movement has received, or state the intimidation tactics employed against those who consider BDS against Israel. More importantly, they fail to compare the time lines of the two struggles. The official calls to boycott apartheid South Africa began in 1958. Apartheid officially came down in 1994, with the march towards equality still in its infancy.

The calls to boycott and divest in Israel began in 2000, and received wide grassroots support from Palestine in the form of the BDS call only in 2005. The latter marked by the Economist as the starting point of the campaign. Which makes it even more unfair to expect large milestones in this short lifetime. The anti-apartheid movement received its first concrete backing in 1974 when the International Olympic Committee suspended South Africa's membership. Given that timeline, and the amount of the misinformation it has to overcome, the BDS movement is making significant strides.
All this recalls the haphazard campaign against South Africa before sanctions got UN backing in 1962. But the anti-Israel movement shows little sign of getting such official support. One reason for this is that Israel has more powerful lobbyists—both in Jewish organisations and in America's evangelical Christian movement, to whom the birth of the Jewish state is a fulfilment of prophecy (some BDS motions passed in American churches really reflect internal Christian rows). Unlike the African National Congress, which acted as both a moral beacon and an organiser for sanctions, the Palestinian leadership does not support BDS—fearing that it will hurt Palestinians as much as Israelis—and is much weaker and more divided.

The chief difference between the Israeli and South African cases is, however, in the moral sphere. Israel is a robust democracy with vibrant academic freedom [blah blah blah]. Whereas it was plain to most South Africans that “separate development” was a cover for a gross system of racism, the rights and wrongs in Palestine are both murkier and more fiercely contested. For all these reasons left-leaning diaspora Jews and campaigners against the occupation often argue against BDS and for more
“constructive” engagement. Boycotting Israeli universities, they note, actually hurts some of the occupation's most trenchant critics (and may thus be unlikely to bother Israeli hawks).

Even fans of BDS do not fully agree on the best way forward. While some call for broad boycotts, others think “smart sanctions”, such as banning goods produced from settlements in the occupied territories, or from specific firms, will have more effect and sidestep claims of anti-Semitism. Israel's economy, they say, is more vulnerable to pressure than South Africa's—smaller, more globally connected and with fewer natural resources. “I don't think the boycotts will be as widespread as with South Africa,” says Mr Hever, “but a small and specific economic impact can change many people's minds.” Perhaps. But blaming Israel alone for the impasse in the occupied territories will continue to strike many outsiders as unfair.
You gotta love how they still try to pull off this “robust democracy” BS.

Digg this

Read More...

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Ramadan Mubarak & Happy Rosh Hashanah

Both of which begin tomorrow, Thursday, Sept 13th, in most of the world.

Peace in the Middle East.


Now I hope every reader would know that I really tried to make a post where I only offer greetings for Ramadan and Rosh Hashanah, but I could not resist or ignore the ironies that came with them. I'm sorry, I can't help it.

Unlike Jews, Muslims around the world do not seem to ever reach consensus on the start date of Ramadan, some still want to observe the new moon the pre-technology way, and others are relying on astrological calculations. Among the latter group, new debates have risen about the criteria for determining the first day of the lunar month, especially as it pertains the hour of the day the new moon forms. Scientific and theological disagreements aside, this issue became a tool of politicians, dictators, and other assholes to display their resentment of others. If one country or group has a grievance with another, they'll make sure to begin "their" Ramadan on a different day. This year, for example, Ramadan is observed Wednesday in Libya, Friday in India and Pakistan, and Thursday just about everywhere else.

On the other hand, Jews rely on Muslims to help them cheat on God's directive. Every seventh year, Jews are expected to let the land lie fallow, and not cultivate it. Therefore, for this "Shmita" year, Jews, represented by the most influential rabbis, symbolically sell "their land" to non-Jews, which some how allows them to continue to cultivate the land during this seventh year, since it technically is not theirs. The Torah apparently does not make Shmita specifications for a land that is stolen in the first place.

[Tarboush tip: Allah]

Digg this

Read More...

Sunday, September 09, 2007

The Yazidis and Geopolitics

You may have heard about the Yazidis in Iraq. Recent systematic attacks on them in Iraq have been called ethnic cleansing by some. They belong to a very small religious sect.

The attacks against the Yazidis, Juan Cole suspects, "are actually part of a struggle for control of territory." He estimates that sooner or later Sunni militias will "wage a major war with the Kurds over the oil fields of Kirkuk." With the American fracturing of Iraq, such sects and the land/oil under their feet become the basis for conflict.

Who are the Yazidis, anyways?

The Arab-American News published a small article about this Kurdish-speaking, transnational, mystical people. The author, Reuel Amdur, concluded:

It appears that, as well as the Muslim elements, their beliefs also show the influence of